Chattisgarh High Court
Rukhmani Bai And Others vs Mohanlal And Others 5 Crmp/1337/2017 ... on 3 February, 2020
Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 277 of 2008
1. Rukhmani Bai W/o Nehru Lal Sahu, Aged about 46
years, R/o Village Ghauvra, Tahsil Dhamtari, Distt.
Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
2. Kaushaliya Thakur W/o Phuleshwari Singh Thakur,
Aged about 41 years, R/o Village Gariyavand, Tahsil
Bariyaband, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Sushila Sahu W/ Sahukar Sahu, Aged about 34 years,
R/o Polekarra, Present Address Near Figeshwar
Chowki, Tahsil Rajim, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Appellants
Versus
1. Mohanlal S/o Late Samaru Ram Sahu, Aged about 36
years.
2. Narayan Sahu S/o Late Samaru Ram Sahu, Aged about
32 years.
Both R/o Village Baruka, Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt.
Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Raj Kumari D/o Late Samaru Ram Sahu, Aged about 44
years, R/o VillageKuderadadar, Tahsil Gariyaband,
Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Foolji Sahu, S/o Samaru Sahu, Aged about 55 years,
R/o Village Gond, Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur,
chhattisgarh.
5. Bahur Sahu, S/o Samaru Sahu, Aged about 55 years,
R/o Village Gond, Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur,
Chhattisgarh.
6. Indal S/o Lakhan Sahu.
7. Dhanush S/o Lakhan Sahu.
8. Pureen D/o Lakhan Sahu.
2
9. Geeta D/o Lakhan Sahu.
10. Kushli Wd/o Lakhan Sahu.
Respondents No. 6 to 10 are R/o Village Gond,
Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
11.State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Respondents
For Appellants : None
For Respondents : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate
For State : Ms. Shivali Dubey, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 03/02/2020
1.The Matter was adjourned by this Court from 29/08/2019 till the last date of hearing i.e. 22/01/2020 on account of the fact that Mr. L.C. Das, learned counsel for the appellants was reported to be on adjustment.
2.Today also the matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared for the appellants in two rounds. In these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.
3.Accordingly, the second appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/ (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet