Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt.Bhumika Sinha And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. 60 ... on 1 May, 2019

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                            1


                                                                                                  NAFR
                               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                                CRMP No. 853 of 2014

                     1. Smt. Bhumika Sinha W/o Ramlal Sinha Aged About 35 Years, Sarpanch of
                        Village Khallari, R/o Village Bhimkhoj, PS And Tah. Mahasamund, Civil and
                        Rev. Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.)

                     2. Ramlal Sinha S/o Karla Sinha Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Bhimkhoj, PS
                        And Tah. Mahasamund, Civil and Rev. Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.)

                     3. Daulal Giri S/o Padum Giri Aged About 42 Years Secretary Of Gram Panchayat,
                        Khallari, PS and Post Mahasamund, Civil and Rev. Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.)

                                                                                        ---- Petitioners

                                                         Versus

                     1. State of Chhattisgarh,        Through   Police   Station    Mahasamund,    Distt.
                        Mahasamund (C.G.)

                     2. Dinesh Agrawal S/o Sajan Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Main
                        Road, Bagbahra, PS and Post Bagbahra, Civil And Rev. Distt. Mahasamund
                        (C.G.)

                                                                                       ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Anuj Singh, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 01.05.2019

1. Statement is made on behalf of the counsel for the Petitioner that the petition has become infructuous.

2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.

3. In view of the same, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Brijmohan