Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Foto Flash vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 16 November, 2012

Author: K.Sreedhar Rao

Bench: K.Sreedhar Rao

                           1


    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012

                       PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO

                         AND

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

                   W.A. No.3404/2012
                         AND
                 W.A.Nos.5112-5119/2012

BETWEEN:-

M/S. FOTO FLASH,
NO.21, P. KALINGA RAO ROAD,
(MISSION ROAD),
BANGALORE- 560 027,
(BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
AHOK FERNANDES, 55 YEARS).
                                          APPELLANT
(BY SRI T.N. KESHAVAMURTHY, ADVOCATE)

AND:-

1      THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
       COMMERCIAL TAXES,
       ( RECOVERY) - 43,
       B C D 2 & R,
       BANGALORE- 560 020.
                                  2

2     THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF
      COMMERCIAL TAXES,
      (ADMN. & RECOVERY)-3,
      SRINIVASA COMPLEX,
      SESHADRIPURAM,
      BANGALORE - 560020.

3     THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
      GANDHINAGAR,
      BANGALORE - 560009.

4    STATE OF KARNATAKA,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS
     PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
     FINANCE DEPT.,
     VIDHANA SOUDHA,
     BANGALORE - 560001.
                                     RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VEDAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3)
(BY SRI T.K. VEDAMURTHY, AGA FOR R4)

      THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S.4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.4317-
4325/2010(T-KST) DATED 11/08/2010.

    These W.As. are coming on for preliminary hearing this day,
SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered the following:

                          JUDGMENT

It is submitted that the movable properties which are stated to be hypothicated to the bank would be offered as security and in addition, the immovable property would also be offered as security 3 to the respondent for refund of the tax amount. The refund made shall, however be subject to the result of CAP No.1145/2006 pending before the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals are disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE psg*