Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Raipur

Vikram Singh Yadu, Raipur,Raipur vs Ito, Ward-3(1), Raipur, Raipur on 20 February, 2026

              आयकर अपील य अ धकरण          यायपीठ रायपुर म।
             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                      RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR

 BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                          AND
    SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                 आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.54/RPR/2026
                 नधारण वष / Assessment Year : 2022-23

Shri Vikram Singh Yadu,
C-Sunita Nursery Vidham Sabha Road,
Raipur-492 001 (C.G.)
PAN: ACXPY4040M



                                                ........अपीलाथ / Appellant

                                बनाम / V/s.

The Income Tax Officer,
Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.)

                                                ......    यथ / Respondent


                  Assessee by       : Shri Sakshi Gopal Agrawal, CA
                  Revenue by        : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR



      सुनवाई क तार ख / Date of Hearing         : 20.02.2026
      घोषणा क तार ख / Date of Pronouncement    : 20.02.2026
                                        2
                                       Shri Vikram Singh Yadu Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur
                                                                    ITA No.54/RPR/2026



                               आदे श / ORDER

PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM:

The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 10.11.2025 for the assessment year 2022-23 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2. At the very outset, it is noted that as evident from Paras 4, 5 & 7 of the impugned order, the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC vide an ex-parte order had dismissed the appeal of the assessee due to non-compliance by the assessee. For the sake of clarity, the Paras 4, 5 & 7 of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC's order are extracted as follows:

"4. During the course of the Faceless Appeal proceedings, notices were issued to the appellant on various dates. The appellant has not filed his submission till date.
5. Written submission:
No written submission filed by the assessee till date.
7. DISCUSSION, REASON & DECISION The following notices of hearing are issued and served on the email address of appellant as under:
              S. No.   Date       of Compliance date          Remarks
                       issue

                  1.   31.07.2025    12.08.2025               The appellant did not
                                                              respond.

                  2.   08.10.2025    23.10.2025               The appellant did not
                                                              respond.
                                       3
Shri Vikram Singh Yadu Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur ITA No.54/RPR/2026 There was no compliance on the part of the appellant after filing of first appeal and no communication was received from the appellant during course of the appellate proceeding till date."

3. The Ld. Sr. DR has fairly conceded that the matter may be adjudicated denovo on merits before the first appellate authority providing one final opportunity to the assessee.

4. That since as per the factual spectrum and that an ex-parte order has been passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC as there was no compliance from the assessee, in such scenario, in the interest of principles of natural justice, we follow the ratio laid down by the ITAT, "Division Bench", Raipur in the cases of Brajesh Singh Bhadoria Vs. Dy./ACIT, Central Circle-2, Naya Raipur, IT(SS)A Nos. 1 to 6, 8 & 9/RPR/2025, dated 20.03.2025 wherein the Tribunal had dealt with similar issue on the same parameters of ex-parte order passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC and remanded the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC. Accordingly, on same parity of reasoning and on similar terms, we set-aside the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC and remand the matter back to its file for denovo adjudication while complying with the principles of natural justice. At the same time, it is directed that this being the final opportunity, the assessee shall duly comply with the hearing notices from the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC. 4

Shri Vikram Singh Yadu Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur ITA No.54/RPR/2026

5. As per the aforesaid terms, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20th February, 2026.

              Sd/-                                    Sd/-
     AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA                  PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
     (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)                       (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

रायपरु / RAIPUR ; दनांक / Dated : 20th February, 2026. SB, Sr. PS आदे श क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1. अपीलाथ /The Appellant.
2. यथ /The Respondent.
3. The CIT(Appeals)-1, Raipur (C.G.)
4. वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, रायपरु बच, रायपरु / DR, ITAT, Raipur Bench, Raipur.
5. गाड फ़ाइल / Guard File.

आदे शानस ु ार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, रायपरु / ITAT, Raipur.