Kerala High Court
Dr.Satish Bhat.S vs The State Of Kerala Rep. By The on 5 December, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937
WA.No. 414 of 2009 (B) IN WP(C).37947/2007
--------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 37947/2007 DATED 05-12-2008
-------------
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS :-
------------------------------
1. DR.SATISH BHAT.S, S/O.SREEDHARA BHAT,
T.P.9/190, VAILANKARA FLATS, CATHEDRAL ROAD
THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE-673 573.
2. D.VENKATASWARA SHENOY, H.NO.8/3265-A,
'KARTHIKA', EDAKKAD, KOZHIKODE-673 005.
3. KISHORE KRISHNA T.K., S/O.KRISHNA BHAKTHAN,
THUMPAYIL HOUSE, NEAR U.P.SCHOOL
WEST HILL, KOZHIKODE-5.
4. K.BHAGIRATH NATH, 2/504, SHENOYS COLONY,
NALLIKAM, KARAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE.
5. V.NARAYANA PRABHU, S/O.VITTAPA PRABHU,
EX-SERVICEMEN ROAD, WEST HILL, KOZHIKODE-5.
BY ADVS.SRI.GOVIND K.BHARATHAN (SR.)
SRI.C.P.KUNHIKANNAN
SRI.S.K.MADHU
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS :-
------------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE
CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION,
KOZHIKODE.
3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND ACQUISITION), KOZHIKODE.
WA.No. 414 of 2009 (B) IN WP(C).37947/2007
--------------------------------------------
4. SREE KASHI MATH, WEST HILL, CHUNGOM,
KOZHIKODE-5, (BRANCH MATH OF SREE KASHI MATH SAMSTHAN
VARANASI), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
R.MURALIDHARA SHENOY.
5. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY
AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PALAKKAD.
R1 TO R3 BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.GIRIJA GOPAL
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-
2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
jvT
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J &
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
----------------------------------
W.A. No.414 of 2009
--------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of July 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the issue involved in the writ appeal has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Jvt