Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Chattisgarh High Court

Coal India Ltd Through Its Chairman vs Smt. Asha Pandey on 16 June, 2016

                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                          Order Sheet

                                      WA No.246 of 2016

                      Coal India Ltd. and others Versus Smt. Asha Pandey




16/06/2016          Dr. N. K. Shukla, Senior counsel with Shri Vinod
             Deshmukh, counsel for the appellants.
                    Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent.

Heard.

This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No.4994/2015. It is barred by 4 days for which prayer for condonation of delay has been made in I.A. No.1/2016.

On due consideration and being satisfied with the bonafide explanation offered therein, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

Heard on admission.

Learned Senior counsel would submit that the compassionate appointment is an exception to the ordinary mode of recruitment, therefore, it cannot be claimed as a matter of right. The married daughters are a class in themselves, therefore, exclusion of married daughters has reasonable basis with the object sought to be achieved, because usually married daughters reside away and are not dependent on the deceased employee. Dependency of the person concerned on the deceased employee being one of the important factors for consideration of the candidature for grant of compassionate appointment, the exclusion of married daughters is not per se illegal or arbitrary.

He would submit that in some legislations like the Chhattisgarh Ceiling On Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960, married daughters have been excluded from consideration by not allotting them shares in calculation of the extent of land, which is sought to be retained by the family.

Issue notice to the respondent.

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, learned counsel would appear and accept notice for the respondent, therefore, process fee need not be paid.

List it for consideration in the week commencing 18.07.2016.

                        Sd/-                                  Sd/-

                    Judge                                Judge
            Prashant Kumar Mishra                Chandra Bhushan Bajpai




Nirala