Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bangalore District Court

Canara Bank vs Smt.P.Thangam on 19 November, 2021

       IN THE COURT OF THE SMALL CAUSES AT
                    BENGALURU

             PRESENT: RAJU.M.., M.A., LL.B.,
                      XVIII ADDL. JUDGE,
                      Court of Small Causes & ACMM,
                      BENGALURU.

           Dated this the 19th day of November, 2021

                         S.C.No.713/2021

PLAINTIFF:              Canara Bank,
                        Uttarahalli Branch,
                        Represented by Senior Manager,
                        Smt.K.Gowri,
                        W/o Sri.Srinivas Sasthan,
                        Aged about 59 years.

                                        (By Sri.RRA.,Adv)
                  V/s
DEFENDANT:              Smt.P.Thangam,
                        W/o Sri.Ravi Kumar,
                        Aged about 38 years,
                        No.13, Old No.7/2,
                        Near Arehalli Arch,
                        Kodipalya, Uttarahalli,
                        Bengaluru­560 061.

                                        (Exparte)

Date of institution of the suit:             20.09.2021

Nature of suit:                              Money suit

Date of commencement of
recording of evidence:                        16.11.2021
 SCCH-4                                 2                 SC No.713/2021

Date of pronouncement of judgment:                   19.11.2021


Duration:                          Year/s            Month/s Day/s
                                    00                 01     29
                              *******
                     : J U D G M E NT :

      The plaintiff Bank has filed this suit against the

defendant for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,66,100/­ along with

current and future interest at the rate of 11.90% p.a.,

compounded monthly with respect to term loan and at

Rs.9.50%, from the date of suit till the date of realisation.

      2. The plaint averments in brief is as under:

      The plaintiff is a Banking company constituted under

the   Banking      Companies          (Acquisition    and   Transfer   of

Undertakings) Act 1970, having its head office at No.112,

J.C.Road, Bengaluru­560 002, and a Branch office inter alia at

Uttarahalli Branch, Bengaluru­560 061, represented by its

Senior Manager.

      The defendant approached the plaintiff bank for the

purpose     of   credit   facility.    The   plaintiff   accordingly   on

05.03.2018 granted a term loan of Rs.2,00,000/­ to the
 SCCH-4                       3              SC No.713/2021

defendant for her Saree business needs.    The defendant to

ensure prompt repayment of the loan amount availed by her

executed the necessary documents like on demand and pro

note and agreement cum hypothication deed dated 5.3.2018.

in favour of the plaintiff bank. The defendant as per the

sanction terms and the documents agreed to repay the loan

amount along with interest at the rate of 10.85% p.a.,

compounded. The defendant has also agreed to pay interest at

varied rate as per the changes in the rate of interest.   The

defendant have also agreed to pay over due interest of 2% in

case of default in payment of loan amount as agreed.      The

defendant under took to repay the loan amount in 36 equated

monthly installments of Rs.6,787/­ each commencing from

31.03.2018 and interest to be paid as and when due. Further

the defendant again approached the plaintiff bank for the

purpose of credit facility. The further submits that,     on

25.06.2020 also it has granted an guarantee emergency credit

limit facility of Rs.24,000/­ to the defendant for her saree

business needs. In this regard the defendant has executed on
 SCCH-4                           4                 SC No.713/2021

demand promissory       note, Take delivery        letter   to DPN,

agreement     cum   hypothication    deed,   and    particulars   of

equipments dated 25.6.2020. The defendant as per the

sanction terms and the documents executed agreed to repay

the loan amount along with interest 6.90% p.a., compounded.

The defendant has also agreed to pay over due interest at 2%

in case of default in payment of loan amount as agreed and to

repay the loan amount in 36 equated monthly installments of

Rs.747/­ each with a repayment holiday of 12 months from

date of availing the loan and interest to be paid as and when

due.     The defendant continued the default in operation the

account inspite of repeated demands, personal approaches

made by the plaintiff officials. The plaintiff finally got issued a

legal notice dated 13.09.2021 and recalled the entire amount

due. The defendant has neither replied to the notice nor paid

the amount due under the notice. The cause of action for the

suit has arisen to the plaintiff on 05.03.2018 and 25.06.2020

and when the defendant availed the credit facilities and

executed the suit documents in favour of the plaintiff bank.
 SCCH-4                           5                 SC No.713/2021

      3.    After service summons the defendant is placed

exparte.

      4. To prove the case of plaintiff the Senior Manager of

plaintiff   bank examined as P.W.1 and got marked the

documents at Ex.P.1 to P.14.

      5.    The following points arise for my consideration.­

            1. Whether the plaintiff    prove that
               defendant has availed loan of
               Rs.2,00,000/­ on 05.03.2018 and
               Rs.24,000/, on 25.6.2020?

            2. Whether the plaintiff prove that the
               defendant has agreed to pay interest
               as sought for ?

            3.   What order or decree?
    6. I have heard the arguments of plaintiff's counsel.

    7. My findings on the above points are as follows:

            Point No.1 and 2: In the affirmative;

            Point No.3 : As per the final orders

                      :REASONS:

      8. Point No.1 and 2: Since these two points are inter

linked with each other, they are taken up together for common

discussion.
 SCCH-4                              6                 SC No.713/2021

        That by reiterating all the averments made in the plaint,

the PW.1 has filed his affidavit in lieu of chief­examination. In

support of his claim, he has produced the loan application,

loan     sanction   letter,   Pro   note   executed    by   defendant,

agreement cum hupothication deed, another loan application,

another sanction letter, Pro note executed by defendant, take

delivery letter to DPN, agreement cum deed of hypothication,

particulars of hypothication, letter of revival, copy of legal

notice along with postal receipt, statement of account along

with certificate and another statement of account along with

certificate. All these documents have been marked as Ex.P.1 to

P.14.

        9.   The documents goes to show that the plaintiff bank

has sanctioned the loan of Rs.200000/­ on 5.3.2018 to the 1 st

defendant, who has agreed to repay the loan with interest at

the rate of 8.30% plus 2.95%. As per the loan account No.

27787680000059 the defendant is due a sum of Rs.

1,39,924/­ as on 13.09.2021.
 SCCH-4                             7                 SC No.713/2021

         10. The plaintiff bank has also sanctioned the loan of

Rs.24,000/­ on 25.6.2020          to the 1 st defendant ,who has

agreed to repay the loan with interest at the rate of 6.90%. As

per another loan account No.2778755000019 the defendant

is due a sum of Rs.24,287/­ as on 25.8.2021.

     11. If at all the defendant did not borrow any loan from

the plaintiff bank, he could have contest the case by putting

forth their     defence.    Whereas, the defendants kept quite

without contesting the suit, an inference could be drawn that

the defendant has borrowed the loan amount. The oral and

documentary      evidence    of   plaintiff   bank   has   not   been

challenged by defendant either by adducing            evidence or by

cross examining the P.W.1.        Hence there are no reasons to

discard the evidence of plaintiff bank. The evidence specifically

reveals that, the defendant No.1 has borrowed the suit amount

from the plaintiff bank but she has not cleared the entire loan

amount. When the defendant has borrowed the loan from the

plaintiff bank there is an obligation on the part of the

defendant to repay the loan amount of Rs.1,39,924/­ along
 SCCH-4                            8              SC No.713/2021

with interest at the rate of 8.30% + 2.95% and defendant is

also liable to pay Rs.24,287/­ with interest at the rate of

6.90%.   Accordingly, I answer point No.1 and              2 in the

affirmative.

     POINT NO.3:

     12. In view of my findings on above points, I proceed to

pass the following.­

                          ORDER

The suit of the plaintiff bank is hereby decreed with cost.

The plaintiff bank is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.1,39,924/­ along with interest at the rate of 11.25% (including penal interest) and Rs.24,287/­ with interest at the rate of 6.90% from the date of suit till the date of realization of entire amount.

Draw decree accordingly. [Dictated to the stenographer directly on computer, typed by her, then corrected by me and pronounced in open court on this the 19th day of November, 2021.] (RAJM.M) XVIII ADDL.JUDGE, Court of Small Causes & ACMM, BENGALURU.

SCCH-4 9 SC No.713/2021

ANNEXURE LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS:

PW.1 : K.Gowri LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:

NONE LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS:
Ex.P.1 : Loan application Ex.P.2 : Loan sanction letter Ex.P.3 : Pro note executed by defendant Ex.P.4 : Agreement cum hypothication deed Ex.P.5 : Another loan application Ex.P.6 : Another sanction letter Ex.P.7 : Pro note executed by defendant Ex.P.8 : Take delivery letter to DPN Ex.P.9 : Agreement cum deed of hypothication Ex.P.10 : Particulars of hypothication Ex.P.11 : Letter of revival Ex.P.12 : Copy of legal notice along with postal receipt Ex.P.13 : Statement of account along with certificate Ex.P.14 : Another statement of account along with certificate LIST OF THE DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:
NONE (RAJM.M) XVIII ADDL.JUDGE, Court of Small Causes & ACMM, BENGALURU.