Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Between vs The Himachal on 15 November, 2021

Author: Sabina

Bench: Sabina

                                      1




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                 ON THE 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
                                  BEFORE




                                                              .
                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ





                              CHIEF JUSTICE
                                      &





                     HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
                  CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5813 of 2021





                 Between:-
          SH. JAWAHAR LAL,
          S/O SH. BRIKAM,
          R/O VILLAGE MAJYAL,

          P.O. TOTU, TEHSIL &
          DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P.                            ......PETITIONER

          (BY SHRI O.P. GOEL,
          ADVOCATE)

          AND



    1.    THE HIMACHAL PRADESH
          TOURISM DEVELOPMENT




          CORPORATION LTD.
          THROUGH ITS MANAGING
          DIRECTOR, RITZ ANNEXE,





          SHIMLA-171001.
    2.    THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS
          OFFICER, HPTDC, RITZ





          ANNEXE, SHIMLA-171001.                       .....RESPONDENTS

          (BY SHRI NARESH KAUL,
          ADVOCATE)
    ________________________________________________________

         This Civil Writ Petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble

    Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed the following:




                                             ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:17:03 :::CIS
                                          2




                                    ORDER

The parties are ad idem that the issue in question is no longer res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this .

Court in CWP No.5725 of 2021, titled Ram Krishan vs. The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and another, which was disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.7.2014.

2. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the basis of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment.

3. Consequently, the respondents are directed to pay all retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of six months from today.

However, it is made clear that in case the retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioner within the aforesaid time, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioner shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of payment.

( Mohammad Rafiq ) Chief Justice ( Sabina ) Judge November 15, 2021 (ks) ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:17:03 :::CIS