Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

M/S. Freight Bridge Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Blue Marine Freight Forwarders Pvt. ... on 24 July, 2018

                    IN THE COURT OF SH. VIKRANT VAID: 
                    ACJ/CCJ/ARC­(SOUTH EAST DISTRICT), 
                         SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI

New CS No.780/17

M/s. Freight Bridge Logistics  Pvt. Ltd. 
501, 5th floor, 56, Eros  Apartments,
Nehru Place, New Delhi­ 110019.
                                                                                  ............. Plaintiff
                     Versus

M/s Blue  Marine Freight  Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. 
WZ.83, Second floor,  Dwarka More,
Opposite Gopalji dairy, New Delhi­110059

                                                                                  ............Defendant

                     SUIT  FOR RECOVERY OF RS. 1,28,565/­

                                   Date of filing- 09.06.2017
                                  Date of Judgment- 24.07.2018


                                                JUDGMENT

1.  It is plaintiff's  case that plaintiff  company is engaged in the business  of freight  forwarding, logistics handling  and custom clearance of   shipments.   Defendant   is   also   a     company   incorporated   under   the Companies   Act,   1956.   In   the   year   2014­15,     defendant   company approached   and   availed   the   services   of   plaintiff   company   for carriage/export of shipment/cargo/consignments of  its customers to the desired   destination.   Consequent   to   the     booking   of   said consignments/shipments, the plaintiff raised invoices against the same. However,   defendant   defaulted     in   making   payments     against     the invoices raised by the plaintiff and therefore, the plaintiff was  compelled M/s Freight Bridge Logistics Pvt Ltd. vs. M/s Blue Marine Freight Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. CS No.780/17 Page 1 of 3 to sent  a Legal Notice dated 14.09.2015 to the defendant  for recovery of outstanding amount of Rs. 90,182/­ but defendant failed to pay the said outstanding amount. Hence, the present suit was filed   for recovery of Rs.   1,28,565/­   (including   interest)  alongwith  pendente   lite  and   future interest @ 18%  per annum.

2.  The summons of the suit  were served upon the defendant. However, he failed to appear before the Court and hence, defendant  was proceeded against ex­parte.

3.  In   ex­parte   evidence,   Sh.   Ganesh   L.,   AR   of   the   plaintiff company was examined as sole witness 'PW­1'. He tendered his evidence by way of affidavit as Ex. PW1/A and  reiterated the averments made in the plaint. He relied upon the following documents:­ i. Copy   of   extracts   of   the   Board   Resolution   dated   12.05.2017  as  Ex.PW­1/1.

ii. Computer  generated  Invoices  as Ex.PW­1/2 (colly).   iii.  Computer  generated  statement of account of defendant  reflecting the total unpaid/outstanding service charges    as Ex. PW1/3.

iv. Computer   generated   e­mails   dated   29.04.2015   &   30.04.2015 as Ex. PW1/4 (colly). 

vii.  Copy   of   legal   notice   dated   14.09.2015   along   with     postal receipts and returned   envelope   as  Ex. PW1/5   (colly).

viii.  Copy   of   the   letter   dated   08.10.2015   along   with     postal receipts and returned   envelope   as  Ex. PW1/6   (colly).

4.  I have heard the arguments and considered the material on record.

5.  The AR of the plaintiff was examined as PW­1 in order to M/s Freight Bridge Logistics Pvt Ltd. vs. M/s Blue Marine Freight Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. CS No.780/17 Page 2 of 3 prove   the   plaintiff's   case.   PW­1   has   deposed   in   consistence   with   the plaintiff's case. The deposition of PW­1 went unchallenged as he was not cross examined. I have no reason to disbelieve the unrebutted testimony of   PW­1   and   veracity   of   the   documents   proved   as   Ex.PW1/1   to Ex.PW1/6 (colly). In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to the decree of Rs. 90,182/­.

6.  The plaintiff is claiming interest @ 18% per annum which in my opinion is exorbitant and unreasonable. Considering the totality of circumstances, I am of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if plaintiff is granted interest @ 6% p.a.

7.  In light of the above discussions, the suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed and it is held that defendant is liable to pay Rs. 90,182/­ alongwith  pendente   lite  and   future   interest   @   6%   per   annum   w.e.f. 09.06.2017 till realization of the decretal amount.

8.  Costs of the suit are awarded in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

9.  Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.

Announced in the open Court                                                (Vikrant Vaid)
today on 24th July, 2018                                               ACJ/CCJ/ARC­(SE)
                                                                       Saket Courts, New Delhi




M/s Freight Bridge Logistics Pvt Ltd. vs. M/s Blue Marine Freight Forwarders Pvt. Ltd.   CS No.780/17   Page 3 of 3