Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Sima Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Chief ... on 21 September, 2015

Author: Aparesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Aparesh Kumar Singh

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                 W.P. (S) No. 1845 of 2014
                                             ---
         Sima Singh                                     ---     --- ---- Petitioner
                                          Versus
         1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary,
            Government of Jharkhand
         2. The Chairman, Jharkhand Public Service Commission
         3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission
         4. The Controller of Examination,
            Jharkhand Public Service Commission         ---     --- --- Respondents
                                             ---
         CORAM:         The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh

          For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Advocate
          For the Resp-State: Mr. Deepak Kr. Dubey, JC to SC-I
          For the Resp-JPSC: Mr. Sanjay Piperwall, Advocate
                                            ---
03/ 21.09.2015

Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner sought direction upon the respondent-JPSC to make necessary recommendation of his candidature for the post of Drug Inspector (Recruitment Examination, 2013) where she participated as a OBC-II candidate having roll no. 2011536.

3. From the affidavit of the respondent-JPSC, which does not stand refuted by the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner's OMR Sheet could not be evaluated due to wrong shadowing of the Booklet / non-shadowing of bubbles; petitioner has not followed the instructions mentioned in the admit card and OMR Sheet and has shadowed two booklet series due to which, OMR Scanning Machine could not read her OMR Sheet and it stood rejected. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that if that be so, petitioner cannot make out a case for any interference.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid conspicuous facts brought on record by the Examining Body, petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference. She is also shown to have secured 158 marks contrary to her assertion that she scored 315 marks. In the BC-II Category, the last recommended candidate had scored 305 marks. Therefore, the prayer for reevaluation of the papers of the petitioner is also not called for. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.

(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/