Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vijay Ramkrushna Jawanjal vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P. I. Akot City ... on 22 June, 2021

Author: Amit B. Borkar

Bench: V.M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar

                                     1                                     3-apl-616-18.odt

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                        NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 616 OF 2018
                               Vijay Ramkrushna Jawanjal
                                                Vs.
    State of Mah. through PI Akot City PS, Akot, Dist. Akola and others
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of                             Court's or Judge's Order
 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
 or directions and Registrar's order
                  Shri D. R. Khapre, Advocate for applicant.
                  Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P. P. for non-applicant no. 1 and 2/State.



                                   CORAM :-         V. M. DESHPANDE AND
                                                    AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
                                   DATED :-         22.06.2021


                                   Hearing        was     conducted         through       Video

Conferencing and learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality were proper.

2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashment of the First Information Report No. 229/2018 registered with Akot Police Station against the applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(R)(S) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. On 16.07.2018, notice for final disposal was issued in this matter and interim relief was granted in favour of the applicant.

3. In spite of the service of notice on the non- applicant no. 2 (Complainant), he is not appearing. On 09.12.2020, after hearing the learned Senior Advocate ::: Uploaded on - 22/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 23/06/2021 07:16:04 ::: 2 3-apl-616-18.odt appearing for the applicant, the Court admitted this matter and fixed the matter for final hearing and also ordered interim relief to continue.

4. Today, this matter was listed and Shri D. R. Khapre, learned Advocate for the applicant informs that as per his instructions, the applicant- Shri Vijay Ramkrushna Jawanjal passed away and therefore, nothing survives in this criminal application.

5. The statement of the learned Advocate for the applicant regarding death of the applicant- Shri Vijay Ramkrushna Jawanjal is accepted.

6. In that view of the matter, the present application is disposed of as abetted.

                                       JUDGE                                 JUDGE



RR Jaiswal




        ::: Uploaded on - 22/06/2021                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/06/2021 07:16:04 :::