Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

The State Of Gujarat vs Hari Om Quarry Works on 12 February, 2016

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani, G.R.Udhwani

                 O/OJCA/585/2015                                             ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                        CIVIL APPLICATION (OJ) NO. 585 of 2015

                           In STAMP NUMBER NO. 2156 of 2015

         ==========================================================
                         THE STATE OF GUJARAT....Applicant(s)
                                      Versus
                        HARI OM QUARRY WORKS....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR PRANAV TRIVEDI ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
         Applicant(s) No. 1
         UCHIT N SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                        and
                        HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                   Date : 12/02/2016


                                    ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 140 days caused in filing Tax Appeal (Stamp) No.2156 of 2015 wherein the order dated 23.12.2014 passed by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal in Second Appeal No.641 of 2014 is subject matter of challenge.

2. Heard Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned Assistant Government Pleader of the applicant and Mr. Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the respondent.





                                        Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC                               Page 1 of 2      Created On Sat Feb 13 03:13:58 IST 2016
                     O/OJCA/585/2015                                                 ORDER




3. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties and more particularly, the averments made in the memorandum of the application, the court is of the view that the delay caused in filing the appeal has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (G.R.UDHWANI, J.) zgs Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Sat Feb 13 03:13:58 IST 2016