Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vvf vs State on 8 September, 2010

Author: S.J.Mukhopadhaya

Bench: S.J. Mukhopadhaya

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/10285/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR BRINGING HEIRS No. 10285 of 2010
 

In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1573 of 2009
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1325 of 2000
 

With


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 1573 of 2009
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1325 of 2000
 

 
 
=================================================
 

VVF
LTD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT, THROUGH SECRETARY & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

================================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR
HARDIK P MODH for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR UMESH TRIVEDI AGP for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

Date
: 08/09/2010 

 

 
 


 

ORDER

IN CA:

The petition for substitution filed vice 3rd respondent Shri Harshadbhai Kanjibhai Balar. Petitioner could come to know the same through his counsel on the last date when the other side informed that the 3rd respondent has expired. The names of legal heirs of 3rd respondent have been mentioned at paragraph no.3 of the petition, i.e. widow, two sons and one daughter (total four). Prayer has been made to substitute the legal heirs in place of the deceased 3rd respondent. Having heard counsel for the parties, we allow the petition and substitute the heirs of 3rd respondent as respondents nos. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 to the Letters Patent Appeal.

ORDER IN LPA:

Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Notice be issued to the substituted legal heirs of the 3rd respondent. Direct notice is permitted. Mr. Umesh Trivedi, A.G.P. has appeared for respondent-State. Appeal may be disposed of at the stage of admission. Post the matter on 04.10.2010 along with Letters Patent Appeal No. 1200 of 2009.
(S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA, C.J.) (ANANT S. DAVE, J.) [sn devu] pps     Top