Gujarat High Court
Yogesh Shyambhai Sindhi vs State Of Gujarat on 18 January, 2021
Author: A.Y. Kogje
Bench: A.Y. Kogje
R/CR.MA/15535/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 15535 of 2020
===============================================================
YOGESH SHYAMBHAI SINDHI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==============================================================
Appearance:
MR RJ GOSWAMI(1102) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.H.K.PATEL, APP, (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 18/01/2021
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR No.42 of 2019 registered with Pethapur Police Station, Gandhinagar for offence under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
3. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent- State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
Page 1 of 4 Downloaded on : Mon Jan 18 21:04:19 IST 2021
R/CR.MA/15535/2020 ORDER
4. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.
5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-
I. The FIR is registered on 15.06.2019 for the offence which is alleged to have taken place on 12.06.2019.
II. The applicant is in jail since 04.09.2020.
III. The investigation qua the applicant is concluded as the remand period is over.
IV. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant is aged 19 years, studying and was having an affair with the prosecutrix who is aged 17 years and one month.
V. Considering the statement of the prosecutrix, element of love affair cannot be ruled out.
VI. Learned APP under instructions of IO is unable to bring on record any special circumstances against the applicant.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular Page 2 of 4 Downloaded on : Mon Jan 18 21:04:19 IST 2021 R/CR.MA/15535/2020 ORDER bail.
7. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR No.42 of 2019 registered with Pethapur Police Station, Gandhinagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
(f) furnish the present address of his residence to
Page 3 of 4
Downloaded on : Mon Jan 18 21:04:19 IST 2021
R/CR.MA/15535/2020 ORDER
the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;
8. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
9. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.
10. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
11. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J) SIDDHARTH Page 4 of 4 Downloaded on : Mon Jan 18 21:04:19 IST 2021