Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Subramaniam Balkrishnan Thevar @ Mani ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 August, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

                                                                                        BA 2994-18.doc



Anand            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2994 OF 2018

         Subramaniam Balkrishnan Thevar                                      .Applicant

                          Vs.

         The State of Maharashtra                                            .Respondent

         Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Mr. Ankit Takle i/b. Mr. Mahesh M. Mule,
         Advocate, for the Applicant
         Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent - State
         Mr. Nilesh Baban Tambe, API, Crime Branch, Navi Mumbai present

                           CORAM       :      REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

                           DATE        :      28.08.2019
         P. C.

         .                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.



         2.                By this Application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

         bail in connection with C. R. No. 169 of 2016 registered with the NRI

         Sagari Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable

         under Sections 395, 397, 120B of the Indian Penal Code; under Sections

         3, 25 of the Arms Act; under Section 37(1) r/w 135 of the Maharashtra

         Police Act and under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) of the MCOC Act.



         3.                Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that there is no

         material to connect the Applicant with the alleged offence. He submits

         that the only allegation against the Applicant is that he had kept the
                                                                                             1 of 5


        ::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2019                       ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2019 21:02:21 :::
                                                                             BA 2994-18.doc


 ornaments allegedly given by co-accused - Nadar, at his mother's house

 in Tamil Nadu. He submits that apart from the said material, there is no

 other material to show that the Applicant was amongst the five unknown

 persons, who entered the office of Popular Finance Company and

 assaulted and terrorized the working staff with gun and koyta. He

 further states that the Applicant has no antecedents.



 4.                Learned APP has filed an Affidavit of Ajay Ramrao Kadam,

 ACP, Crime Branch, Navi Mumbai. Learned APP does not dispute the

 fact that the Applicant was not amongst the five unknown persons, who

 entered the office of Popular Finance Company, where the incident took

 place. He however, states that the Applicant had kept the ornaments in

 Tamil Nadu with his mother. Learned APP relied on the statement of the

 Applicant's mother - Smt. Yuvmal Balkrishnan.



 5.                Perused the papers. According to the Complainant, the

 incident took place on 06.08.2016 at about 14:45 to 15:00 hours. The

 Complainant has alleged that five persons armed with deadly weapons

 and fire arms entered the office of Popular Finance Company, where the

 Complainant was working and committed dacoity of gold weighing 21

 kgs 993 grams, 900 miligrams ( value of which was about Rs.

 6,69,32,000/- ) as well as cash of Rs. 9,50,000/-, hard disk and DVR.


                                                                                 2 of 5


::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2019                   ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2019 21:02:21 :::
                                                                               BA 2994-18.doc




 6.                During the course of investigation, the Applicant alongwith

 other co-accused were arrested. According to the prosecution, Arputraj

 @ Appu Palraj Nadar is the main gang leader of the organized crime

 syndicate and was engaged in several unlawful activities. As far as the

 Applicant is concerned, it is not in dispute that the Applicant was not

 amongst the five unknown persons who entered the office of Popular

 Finance Company. The allegation as against the Applicant is that he

 handed over the gold ornaments given by co-accused - Arputraj @ Appu

 Palraj Nadar to his mother. The statement of the Applicant's mother

 which is on page No. 806 of the Application shows that on 15.08.2016,

 the Applicant visited her residential house in Tamil Nadu and that he

 gave certain gold ornaments to her for safe keeping. She has stated that

 when she questioned him ( Applicant ) about the ornaments, he

 disclosed that his friend - Arputraj @ Appu Palraj Nadar had given it to

 him for safe keeping. Admittedly, the Applicant has no antecedents. The

 Applicant is in custody since August, 2016. Investigation is complete

 and charge-sheet is filed.



 7.                Considering the aforesaid, it is difficult to come to the

 conclusion that the Applicant is guilty of the alleged offences with

 which he is charged. Accordingly, the Application is allowed and the

 Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms & conditions :-
                                                                                   3 of 5


::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2019                     ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2019 21:02:21 :::
                                                                                BA 2994-18.doc




                                     ORDER

(i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more local sureties in the like amount;

(ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on the first Saturday of every month between 10:00 a. m. and 12.00 noon till the conclusion of the trial;

(iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

(iv) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of residence and mobile contact number immediately after being released and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time to the Court seized of the matter and to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station;

(v) The Applicant shall not leave Mumbai City / Thane City without prior permission of the trial Court;

(vi) The Applicant to cooperate with the conduct of the trial and attend the Court on every date, unless exempted;

(vii) The Applicant shall file an undertaking with regard to clauses (ii) to (vi) in the trial Court, within two weeks of his release;

(viii) If there are two consecutive defaults either in attending the 4 of 5 ::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2019 21:02:21 ::: BA 2994-18.doc Police Station or in appearing before the trial Court, or breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the Applicant's bail.

8. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

9. It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) 5 of 5 ::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2019 21:02:21 :::