Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Satish Dnyaneshwar Tayade vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ... on 18 October, 2019

Author: Z.A. Haq

Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande, Z.A. Haq

                                                    1                                wp7149.19

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


                                WRIT PETITION NO.7149/2019
                                    Gajanan Dadarao Korde
                                            ..V/s..
                              The State of Maharashtra and others

                             AND WRIT PETITION NO.7150/2019
                                  Sunita Pandurang Sakhe
                                           ..V/s..
                             The State of Maharashtra and others

                             AND WRIT PETITION NO.7151/2019
                                Sandeep Ganeshrao Kavitkar
                                           ..V/s..
                             The State of Maharashtra and others

                             AND WRIT PETITION NO.7152/2019
                                  Dinesh Rameshrao Hend
                                           ..V/s..
                             The State of Maharashtra and others

                             AND WRIT PETITION NO.7153/2019
                                 Satish Dnyaneshwar Tayade
                                           ..V/s..
                             The State of Maharashtra and others

                             AND WRIT PETITION NO.7154/2019
                                   Kailash Manikrao Punse
                                            ..V/s..
                             The State of Maharashtra and others

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                 Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Shri S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for the petitioner.         ..(in all petitions)



                                         CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND
                                                 Z.A. HAQ, JJ.

DATED : 18.10.2019.

                            1]             Heard.


          ::: Uploaded on - 18/10/2019                             ::: Downloaded on - 19/10/2019 06:01:51 :::
                                                      2                              wp7149.19


                               2]           All these petitions are covered by the decision

given by this Court on 14th October, 2019 in Writ Petition No.6436/2019 and connected matters. The petitioners have remedy of preferring representation or an appeal as is provided under the several government resolutions for claiming the benefits or complaining action contrary to the government resolutions and the Divisional Commissioner can look into all these grievances. The petitions are permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner by filing either appropriate representation or an appeal. If such representation or appeal is filed, the same shall be considered by the respondents according to law. The petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

                                            JUDGE                                JUDGE




Tambaskar.




             ::: Uploaded on - 18/10/2019                         ::: Downloaded on - 19/10/2019 06:01:51 :::