Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Neelachal Udyog Limited & Anr vs Kolkata Municipal Corporation Ors on 16 March, 2022

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

16.03.2022
Sl. No. 10
ss
                                   W.P.A. 24275 of 2019

                            Neelachal Udyog Limited & anr.
                                         Vs.
                           Kolkata Municipal Corporation ors.

                              Mr. Jatinder Singh Dhatt
                                          ... for the petitioners

                              Mr. Arijit Dey
                                           ... for the K.M.C.

                              Mr. Susanta Pal
                                         ... for the State


                     The petitioner has placed reliance on a circular

             dated     July   6,    2022    issued   by    the    Municipal

             Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation.

                     The   circular   has   simplified    the    process    of

             mutation of such plots which were originally recorded

             as khatals within the jurisdiction of the Corporation.

                     It is submitted that despite having issued such

             circular, the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, has not

             taken any steps for mutation of the name of the

             petitioner in respect of premises situated at 136E,

             Beliaghata Road.

                     Mr. Dey, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of

             the Corporation submits that the circular was not

             applicable to the petitioner as the premises has been

             recorded in the inspection book as a khatal.                It is

             further submitted that the Thika Controller, despite

             several    approaches      having   been     made      by     the
                         2




Corporation, has not intimated whether the premises

continued to be a khatal or not.

        Mr. Pal, learned Advocate who usually appears

on behalf of the State respondents, is engaged in this

matter to appear on behalf of the Thika Controller as this Court has faith on him and his ability to ensure that the matter is resolved, as per law. His appearance be regularized.

Under such circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the concerned office of the Thika Controller, Kolkata must file a report before this Court, after holding an inspection in presence of the petitioners and the Kolkata Municipal Corporation indicating therein, whether such plot continues to be a khatal at present, or not. This Court prima facie is of the opinion that unnecessary harassments have been caused to the persons who have been in occupation of such areas which are no longer khatals. The policy of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation itself, was to remove all khatals from the city of Kolkata.

According to the orders of the Corporation, there cannot be any khatal within the territorial jurisdiction of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Thus, the inaction on the part of the respondents has troubled the Court. Series of similarly situated person have not been granted mutation.

3

Let such report of the Thika Controller, be filed on April 7, 2022 when the matter will appear next, as urgent motion.

Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the concerned office of the Thika Controller, Kolkata.

All parties are to act on website copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)