Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Fathima vs Director General Of Police on 29 January, 2015

Bench: Ashok Bhushan, A.M.Shaffique

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
                                        &
                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

       WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2016/3RD CHAITHRA, 1938

                           WP(C).No. 6868 of 2015 (G)
                            ---------------------------

      PETITIONER :
      ----------------

       FATHIMA, AGED 29 YEARS
       D/O.MOIDU, RESIDING AT EDAVANA
       VILLIAPPILLY VILLAGE AND DESOM, PO VILLIAPPILLY
       VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
       REP. BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, JAMEELA
       AGED 55 YEARS, D/O.KUNJABDULLA
       RESIDING AT RAMATHU PEEDIKAYIL, VILADAPURAM DESOM
       MUTHUVADATHUR AMSOM, VADAKARA TALUK
       KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

       BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA

      RESPONDENTS :
      -------------------

      1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

      2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
         KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KOZHIKODE-673 001.

      3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
         VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

      4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKARA,
         KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

      5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

      6. KUNJIKANNAN,
         KUNNOTH PONMERI AMSOM, VILLIAPPALLY
         KARTHIKAPPALLY ROAD, AYANCHERRY VILLAGE, VADAKARA
         KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 001.

       R1 TO R5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR
       R6 BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K.

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
23-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6868 of 2015 (G)
--------------------------------
                                   APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
-----------------------------

EXT P1 : THE TRUE COPY POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN
            FAVOUR OF HER MOTHER DATED 29-01-2015.

EXT P1(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P1.

EXT P2 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED DATED 02-02-2013 AND ITS
            TRANSLATION AS EXT P2(A).

EXT P3 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT.

EXT P3(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P3.

EXT P4 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
         WOMEN CELL, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE RURAL,

EXT P4(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT P4.

EXT.P5 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX REGISTER OF AYANCHERRY VILLAGE,
          VADAKRA TALUK.

EXT.P5(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P5.

EXT.P6 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE
          PETITIONER DATED 10.06.2010.

EXT.P6(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P6.

EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AND TO
          THE 6TH RESPONDENT BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR, VADAKARA
          DATED 03.09.2010.

EXT.P7(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P7.

EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION FORWARDED BY THE TALUK
          SURVEYOR TO R.D.O., VADAKARA DATED 14.10.2010.

EXT.P8(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P8.

EXT.P9 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL RDO,
           VADAKARA DATED 12.09.2011.

EXT.P9(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P9.

EXT.P10 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE
            PETITIONER ON 19.06.2013 BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AYANCHERRY
            FOR THE PROPERTY LIES IN RE.SY. No.63/3, PONMARY DESOM,
            AYANCHERRY VILLAGE, HAVNG AN EXTENT OF 7.28 ARES.

WP(C).No. 6868 of 2015 (G)
-------------------------------


EXT.P10(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P10.

EXT.P11 : TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 15.10.2012.

EXT.P11(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P11.

EXT.P12 : TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS DATED 03.09.2013 AND
            16.06.2014.

EXT.P12(A) : THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P12.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------------

EXT.R6(A) : TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA DATED 31.07.75 ISSUED TO THIS
              RESPONDENT'S FATHER FROM THE LAND TRIBUNAL, THODANNUR
              ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.R6(B) : TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.68/82 DATED 12.01.1982
              ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.R6(C) : TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.1535/79 DATED 01.12.1979
               ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.R6(D) : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE DISTRICT SURVEY
              SUPERINTENDENT, KOZHIKODE TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT DATED
              29.07.2015 ALONG WITH ITS TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.




                               /TRUE COPY/

                                          PA TO JUDGE

ttb



                     ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J &
                        A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
                   --------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C) No.6868 of 2015
             --------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 23rd day of March 2016


                           J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This writ petition has been filed seeking for police protection alleging that there had been obstruction from the 6th respondent, when attempts were made by the petitioner for constructing a compound wall. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the 6th respondent that there is dispute between the parties regarding boundary of the property and unless the measurement is taken, the dispute cannot be resolved.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Revenue Divisional Officer is already seized of the matter and had fixed the boundaries.

3. However, the learned counsel for the 6th respondent submits that no boundary had been fixed in accordance with the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we do not think that the police can interfere and resolve the dispute. It W.P.(C) No.6868 of 2015 -: 2 :- shall be open for the parties to approach the competent authorities and seek for necessary interference.

With the above observation, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Jvt/26.3.2016