Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Turbo Engineers (Cbe) vs Tuticorin Thermal Power Station on 8 August, 2023

Author: G.R.Swaminathan

Bench: G.R.Swaminathan

                                                        1       W.P.(MD)NO.23633 OF 2015

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 08.08.2023

                                                    CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                       W.P.(MD)No.23633 of 2015 AND
                                            M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

                     Turbo Engineers (CBE),
                     through its Manager – Sales,
                     K.Arthanaarishwaran.                           ... Petitioner
                                                      Vs.
                     1. Tuticorin Thermal Power Station,
                        Owned by TANGEDCO Ltd.,
                        Rep. through the Chief Engineer,
                        M.M.Division, Tuticorin -4.

                     2. M/s.Rali Engineering Works,
                        No.3/73, Madurai Bye-pass Road,
                        Near BPCL LPG Filling Plant,
                        Tuticorin – 628 101.

                     3. BMW Steels Ltd.,
                        Rep. by its Director,
                        Navipur Road,
                        Hathras 201 101 U.P.                      ... Respondents

                                  Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the
                     Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing
                     the first respondent to declare the petitioner as successful
                     bidder for the Tender No.OT-2711-M opened on 14.10.2015
                     after blacklisting the second respondent as a disqualified
                     person from participating in any of the auction or tenders
                     proposed by the first respondent as prescribed in the tender
                     conditions of the first respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/3
                                                         2        W.P.(MD)NO.23633 OF 2015



                                  For Petitioner   : No appearance.
                                  For R-1          : Mr.S.Dheenadayalan

                                  For R-2          : Mrs.G.Prabahari

                                  For R-3          : Mr.J.Vijayaraja

                                                      ***


                                                   ORDER

None appears for the petitioner.

2. The subject matter relates to awarding of tender.

Cause of action dates back to the year 2015. It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent that the project has subsequently been implemented also. Nothing survives for further adjudication. This writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                            08.08.2023

                     NCC      : Yes / No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes/ No

                     PMU

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/3 3 W.P.(MD)NO.23633 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU W.P.(MD)No.23633 of 2015 08.08.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/3