Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shyla Beegum vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 8 June, 2011

       

  

  

 
 
                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

                   MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/15TH MAGHA 1934

                                      WP(C).No. 3252 of 2013 (F)
                                         --------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

            SHYLA BEEGUM, AGED 50 YEARS
            W/O ABDUL VAHAB,CHIRAYIL PUTYHEN VEEDU,
            MUNDAYILKONAM
            NAGAROOR P.O.,
            ATINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

            BY ADVS.SRI.M.ZIYAD
                          SRI.SANU.S.PANICKER


RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
            ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION,KILIMANOOR
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 001.

        2. SALEENA
            AMINA MANZIL,MUNDAYILKONAM,NAGAROOR P.O.
            ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

            BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2013,
          THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 3252/2013


                               APPENDIX


PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT P1:  TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.6.2011 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL
             DISTRICT MAGISTRATE.

EXHIBIT P2:  TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 11.7.2012 BEFORE THE 1ST
             RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3:  TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 19.8.2012 BEFORE THE K.S.E.B.
             ENGINEER, NAGAROOR.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL


                                                        /TRUE COPY/


                                                        P.A. TO JUDGE.



                   V. CHITAMBARESH,J
                  --------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No. 3252 of 2013
                  -------------------------------------
            Dated this the 4th day of February, 2013

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner contends that the electricity supply line drawn on the basis of Ext.P1 proceedings of the Additional District Magistrate can be shifted. The petitioner has suggested an alternate route along a private pathway by Exts. P2 and P3 representations.

2. I direct the first respondent Assistant Executive Engineer to consider Exts.P2 and P3 representations within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner as well as the second respondent beneficiary shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd