Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 6]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Rajasthan vs Mohd. Haroon on 15 July, 2016

Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant

     ITEM NO.25                              COURT NO.7                      SECTION II

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.)...... CRLMP NO(S).
     10955/2016
     (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 19/08/2015
     IN SBCMP NO. 4734/2013 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT
     JAIPUR)

     STATE OF RAJASTHAN                                                          PETITIONER(S)

                                                       VERSUS

     MOHD. HAROON                                      RESPONDENT(S)
     (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND C/DELAY IN REFILING
     SLP)

     Date : 15/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT

     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr. K.L. Janjani, Adv.
                                             Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.
                                             Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                     O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material.

Delay condoned.

Exemption from filing O.T. is granted. In view of the liberty granted by the High Court to the State to file supplementary charge-sheet for the Signature Not Verified offence under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Digitally signed by VINOD LAKHINA Date: 2016.07.16 10:27:19 IST Reason: Page No.1 of 2 Corruption Act, 1988 in the pending case, we do not see how the State can be prejudiced or aggrieved. We, therefore, do not entertain the present Special Leave Petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.

    [VINOD LAKHINA]                    [ASHA SONI]
      COURT MASTER                    COURT MASTER




                                               Page No.2 of 2