Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Anand Pharmaceuticals, vs The Director General Of Central Excise, on 5 July, 2013

Author: H.G.Ramesh

Bench: H.G.Ramesh

                             -1-

                                         W.P.No.66803/2010

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

               CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2013

                          BEFORE

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

          Writ Petition No.66803/2010 [T-RES]

BETWEEN:

M/S ANAND PHARMACEUTICALS,
3490/5, GOVINDAPUR, MUDHOL,
DIST. BAGALKOT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING
PARTNER, SREE SATISH GHARAGE.                  ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI G.K. HIREGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1.     THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CENTRAL EXCISE,
       INVESTIGATION (CBRU), SADASHIV NAGAR,
       BELGAUM.

2.     THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL
       DEPT. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,
       SHIVASHAKTI, 2ND STAGE, 11TH CROSS,
       WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE.

3.     THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER,
       DEPT. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,
       BELGAUM COMMISSIONARATE,
       71 CLUB ROAD,
       BELGAUM.

4.     THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR,
       KARNATAKA DRUGS LOGISTICS &
       WASTE HOUSING SOCIETY,
       NO. 1 KHB COLONY,
       MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE.               ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT MEGHA C. KOLEKAR, AGA FOR R4
CGSC FOR R1 TO R3)
                              -2-

                                             W.P.No.66803/2010

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:06/08/2010 (ANNEXURE-A), ISSUED
BY 4TH RESPONDENT AND ETC.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Petition dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE Rsh