Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Satya Dev Bhardwaj vs Irrigation And Flood Control ... on 2 March, 2020

                                  के न्द्रीयसूचनाआयोग
                       Central Information Commission
                               बाबागंगनाथमागग,मुननरका
                        Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                         नईददल्ली, New Delhi - 110067

नितीय अपील संख्या / Second Appeal No. CIC/IAFCD/A/2018/123210

Shri Satya Dev Bhardwaj                                  ... अपीलकताग/Appellant
                                    VERSUS/बनाम

PIO/Supdt. Engineer (FC-IV)                              ...प्रनतवादीगण /Respondent
Irrigation & Flood Control Dept.,
Basaidarapur, Delhi


Date of Hearing                        :    02.03.2020
Date of Decision                       :    02.03.2020
Information Commissioner               :    Shri Y. K. Sinha

Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on                :   17.11.2017
PIO replied on                          :   Nil
First Appeal filed on                   :   18.12.2017
First Appellate Order on                :   Nil
2ndAppeal/complaint received on         :   12.04.2018

Information sought

and background of the case:

Appellant filed RTI application dated 17.11.2017 seeking information through 6 points:
1. Provide copy of work orders issued by the O/o SE Zone-I for civil and other works during the years 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18.
2. When was the drain at Dabri Palam Road constructed? What is its validity and expenses incurred so far in its maintenance?
3. Provide copy of Work order, B.O.Q, Hinder Register, Minute Register, Third party inspection report, office report etc regarding construction of above drain worketc.
Having not received any reply from the PIO, Appellant filed First Appeal dated 18.12.2017 which was not adjudicated.Therefore, Appellant approached the Commission in the instant Second Appeal.

Facts emerging in Course of Hearing:

None present from either side during hearing.
Page 1 of 2
Decision:
Since none has appeared for this case, it is not possible to ascertain the actual position/facts as they exist today. Under the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Y. K. Sinha (वाई. के . नसन्द्हा) Information Commissioner(सूचना आयुक्त) Authenticated true copy (अभिप्रमाणितसत्यापितप्रतत) Ram Parkash Grover (राम प्रकाश ग्रोवर) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011-26180514 Page 2 of 2