Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Latha V vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 July, 2024

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                            -1-
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC:26207
                                                    WP No. 28391 of 2023




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                         BEFORE

                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

                      WRIT PETITION NO.28391 OF 2023 (CS-RES)

                 BETWEEN:

                 SMT. LATHA V
                 W/O DEEPAK G,
                 AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
                 KANAKATTE VILLAGE,
                 ARSIKERE TOWN, HASSAN
                                                            ...PETITIONER
                 (BY SRI. SAILESH S.K., ADVOCATE)


                 AND:

                 1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION,
Digitally signed      MULTI STORIED BUILDING,
by
DHARMALINGAM          AMBEDKAR BEEDHI,
Location: HIGH        BANGALORE-560001
COURT OF
KARNATAKA        2.   REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
                      ALI ASKER ROAD,
                      BANGALORE-560001

                 3.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE
                      SOCIETIES AND RECOVERY OFFICER
                      HASSAN SUB DIVISION,
                      HASSAN.
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:26207
                                     WP No. 28391 of 2023




4.   K.R. RAVI
     S/O RAMANNA,
     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
     KANAKATTE VILLAGE,
     ARSIKERE TOWN,
     HASSAN-573201

5.   PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PATINA
     CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY
     KANAKATTE, ARSIKERE TALUK,
     HASSAN-573201
                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3
    SRI. VINAYAKA B., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)


     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE R3 DATED 02/11/2023 AT
ANNEXURE-G AND QUASH THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF
DATED 08/12/2023 AT ANNEXURE-H DEMOTING THE
PETITIONER FROM THE POST OF THE SECRETARY AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

The petitioner who was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the 5th respondent - Society is before this Court aggrieved of the resolution passed by the Board of the 5th respondent - Society relegating the petitioner back to her previous post as Clerk in the said Society. -3-
NC: 2024:KHC:26207 WP No. 28391 of 2023 Interim orders were passed by this Court on 18.12.2023 staying the impugned resolution dated 08.12.2023 insofar as it relates to demotion of the petitioner till the next date of hearing.

2. On entering appearance, learned counsel for the 5th respondent has raised a preliminary objection that such a writ petition could not have been entertained by the petitioner having regard to the availability of alternative and efficacious remedy to the petitioner in the form of Section 70, where a dispute was required to be raised by the petitioner before the competent authority.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is required to re-approach the appellate authority, the interim protection granted by this Court should be extended for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to file necessary appeal and an application seeking interim stay of the impugned resolution.

-4-

NC: 2024:KHC:26207 WP No. 28391 of 2023

4. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Society Act before the competent authority questioning the impugned resolution dated 08.12.2023 passed by the Board of the 5th respondent Society. However for that purpose the interim order passed by this Court on 18.12.2023 shall be kept alive for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to file an appeal and an application seeking stay of the impugned resolution.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE KLY CT: JL