Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shree Ramkrishna Seva Mandal vs Anand Municipality on 8 March, 2017

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

                  C/SCA/1019/2017                                            ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1019 of 2017
         ================================================================
                 SHREE RAMKRISHNA SEVA MANDAL, PUBLIC TRUST,....Petitioner(s)
                                        Versus
         ANAND MUNICIPALITY, NOTICE TO BE SERVED THROUGH & 2....Respondent(s)
         ================================================================
         Appearance:
         MR DC DAVE, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR JIGAR M PATEL, ADVOCATE for
         Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ================================================================
          CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI

                                    Date : 08/03/2017
                                     ORAL ORDER

Heard   Mr.D.C.Dave,   learned   Senior   Advocate   with  Mr.Jigar   M.   Patel,  learned   advocate  for   the  petitioner.

It   is   submitted   that   the  petitioner­Trust   does  not fall within the purview of the directions issued  by the Division Bench of this Court  vide  order dated  23.03.2016, passed in Writ Petition (PIL) No.175/2012,  inasmuch as there is no water­body in the Final Plot  leased out to the petitioner. Further, the petitioner  has not put up any construction on the said Final Plot  after the Notification dated 31.03.2003, as stated in  the above order. It is submitted that the  petitioner  is   using   the   land   in   question   as   a   playground­cum­ Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 06:53:34 IST 2017 C/SCA/1019/2017 ORDER garden for the School put up by the petitioner­Trust.  It is further submitted that the Final Plot leased out  to the petitioner is not mentioned in the Notification  regarding   water­body.   It   is   further   submitted   that  without   taking   into   consideration   the   above  submissions   of   the   petitioner,   the   Collector   has  straightaway,  vide  the impugned order, cancelled the  lease of the petitioner and directed that the land be  restored as a water­body.

Issue Notice returnable on 19.04.2017. Ad­interim   relief   in   terms   of   paragraph­6(B)   is  granted, till then.

In addition to the normal mode of service, Direct  Service is also permitted. 

(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) Gaurav+ Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Mon Aug 14 06:53:34 IST 2017