Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.V.N.C.Electrodes vs M/S.Royal Welding Wires Private ... on 4 September, 2023

Author: P.T. Asha

Bench: P.T. Asha

                                                                            C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                            Dated : 04.09.2023

                                                 CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA


                                            C.S . No. 285 of 2020

                     M/s.V.N.C.Electrodes,
                     No.3, Industrial Estate,
                     S.Vellalapatti,
                     Karur 639 004, Tamil Nadu.
                     Administrative office at 11/4,
                     MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalai puram,
                     Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 028.
                     A registered partnership
                     Firm rep by its Managing Partner
                     C.Basker                                        ... plaintiff

                                                    Vs.

                     M/s.Royal Welding Wires Private Limited,
                     No.2, Uthiramerur Road,
                     Malaiyapalayam P.O. 603 303.
                     Mathuranthagam Taluk,
                     Kanchipuram District.                             ... defendant


                     Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with
                     Sections 27(2), 29(1), 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999,

                     1/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                     read with Section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 read with Section
                     2(1)(c)(xvii) and Section 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read
                     with Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules for
                                  A.grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, infringing the Plaintiff's Trademark
                     “BEST WELD”, written in a stylized manner, using such offending
                     trademark or any other mark or marks which are identical/similar or in
                     any way deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the
                     paintiff's trademark or any other brand name/mark or otherwise; until
                     such period that the plaintiff's trademark is valid and subsisting;
                                  B.grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, infringing the plaintiff's other mark “BEST
                     ARC” using such offending trademark or any other mark or marks
                     which are identical/similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a
                     colourable imitation of plaintiff's trademark or any other brand
                     name/mark or otherwise; until such period that the plaintiff's
                     trademark is valid and subsisting;
                                  C.granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, infringing the plaintiff's registered
                     trademark “VNC” using such offending trademark or any other mark
                     2/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                     or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a
                     colourable imitation of the plaintiff's trademark or any other brand
                     name/mark or otherwise; until such period that the plaintiff's
                     trademark is valid and subsisting;
                                  D.grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner from infringing the copyright pertaining to
                     the artistic work comprised in the carton filed as Material object No.1,
                     from using the offending carton filed as Material Object No.2 or any
                     other colour combination/essential features which are similar to or in
                     any way deceptively similar or the colourable imitation of the
                     plaintiff's carton;
                                  E.grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, passing off of the defendant's composite
                     label along with the red and rose colour combination as and for of the
                     plaintiff's trade mark label, containing the word ' BEST WELD' OR
                     'BEST ARC' in a specialized manner, with an image in between the
                     word ' BEST' and 'WELD' or 'BEST' and 'ARC' as the case may be,
                     device of a men with his arms spread out, and an arc drawn from one
                     hand to the other, in colour scheme, get up, font and layout, using the
                     offending trade mark or any other mark which is identical to or
                     deceptively similar to or in any way a colourable imitation of the
                     3/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                     plaintiff's trademarks, either by manufacturing, selling or offering for
                     sale of advertising or in any other manner;
                                  F.grant of a permanent injunction restraining defendant, its men,
                     relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them
                     from, in any manner, passing off of the defendant's trademark as and
                     for the plaintiffs trademark label, containing the work 'BEST WELD'
                     written in a stylized manner, with an image in between the words '
                     BEST' and 'WELD' being the device of a man with his arms spread
                     out, and an arc drawn from one hand to the other, in colour scheme,
                     get up, font and layout, using the offending trade mark or any other
                     mark which is identical to or deceptively similar to or in any way a
                     colourable imitation of the plaintiff's trademarks, either by
                     manufacturing, selling or offering for sale of advertising or in any
                     other manner;
                                  G. grant of a permanent injunction restraining defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, passing off of the defendant's trademark as
                     and for the plaintiffs trademark label, containing the work 'BEST
                     ARC' written in a stylized manner, with an image in between the
                     words ' BEST' and 'ARC' being the device of a man with his arms
                     spread out, and an arc drawn from one hand to the other, in colour
                     scheme, get up, font and layout, using the offending trade mark or any
                     other mark which is identical to or deceptively similar to or in any
                     4/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                     way a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's trademarks, either by
                     manufacturing, selling or offering for sale of advertising or in any
                     other manner;
                                  H. grant of a permanent injunction restraining defendant, its
                     men, relatives, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under
                     them from, in any manner, passing off of the defendant's mark as and
                     for of the plaintiff's trademark 'VNC', consisting of the term 'VNC' in
                     combination with three slanted lines depicted in a specialized manner,
                     using the offending trade mark or any other mark which is identical to
                     or deceptively similar to or in any way a colourable imitation of the
                     plaintiff's trademarks, either by manufacturing, selling or offering for
                     sale of advertising or in any other manner;
                                  I. Grant of a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant
                     from either by manufacturing or selling or offering for sale or in any
                     manner advertising the Plaintiff's trade marks on _ welding
                     electrodes, Arc welding electrodes, Automatic and Semi-Automatic
                     welding equipment being the goods covered by the Plaintiff's
                     registration and also being the goods manufactured and sold by the
                     Defendant;


                                  J.For a decree that the entire stock of the impugned goods in the
                     custody of the Defendant be seized and kept in the custody of the
                     Hon’ble Court or the custody thereof be handed over to the Plaintiff
                     5/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         C.S . No. 285 of 2020



                     and/or its representatives/agents;


                                  K.Directing the Defendant to render the true, correct and
                     faithful account of the sale of the goods under the Trademarks ‘BEST
                     WELD’ of the Plaintiff to ascertain the exact amount of damages
                     accrued to the Plaintiff;


                                  L.Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiff the entire
                     stock of unused labels of the Defendant with the Trademark ‘BEST
                     WELD’ together with the cartons, label, brochures, printing blocks,
                     films, Floppies, CD’s and other materials containing the offending
                     trademark deceptively similar to that of the Plaintiff;


                                  M.for the costs of the suit from the Defendant, jointly and
                     severally; and


                                  N.pass such other further orders as this Honourable Court may
                     deem fit and proper under the said circumstances of the case and thus
                     render Justice.


                                        For Plaintiffs    :     Mr. T.K.Ramkumar

                                        For Defendants    :     Mr. M.S.Bharath.


                     6/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S . No. 285 of 2020




                                                    JUDGEMENT

The parties have entered into a memorandum of compromise before the Mediator, Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras and the terms of the compromise have been reduced into writing. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the memorandum of compromise. The terms of the compromise along with the annexures shall form part of the decree. No costs.



                                                                                   04.09.2023
                     Internet   : Yes/No
                     Index            :Yes/No
                     Speaking / Non-Speaking
                     kan




                     7/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S . No. 285 of 2020 P.T. ASHA. J, kan C.S . No. 285 of 2020 04.09.2023 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis