Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

B Ramaiah vs S Munithayappa on 8 February, 2024

Author: H.P.Sandesh

Bench: H.P.Sandesh

                                                -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:5410
                                                        MFA No. 5076 of 2021




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5076 OF 2021 (CPC)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    B. RAMAIAH
                         S/O LATE N. BALAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

                   2.    B. LAKSHMANA
                         S/O LATE N. BALAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

                   3.    SRI B. PARASHURAM
                         S/O LATE N. BALAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

                         ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.47/1,
                         SWASTHI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR
                         BENGALURU-560027.
                                                               ...APPELLANTS

Digitally signed             (BY SRI. S.G.PARTHASARATHY, ADVOCATE)
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH     AND:
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   1.    S. MUNITHAYAPPA
                         S/O LATE SHAMANNA
                         AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

                   2.    M. CHANDRASHEKAR
                         S/O S. MUNITHAYAPPA
                         AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

                   3.    SMT. KANTHAMMA
                         W/O LATE S. MUNITHAYAPPA
                         D/O LATE N. BALAIAH
                         AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                           -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:5410
                                    MFA No. 5076 of 2021




     ALL ARE RESIDENT OF NO.13,
     SWASTHI ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR
     BENGALURU-560027.

4.   SMT. SHAMA
     D/O LATE N. BALAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.287
     5TH MAIN, ST BED LAYOUT
     KORAMANGALA
     BENGALURU-560034

5.   SMT. AMBUJAKSHI
     W/O JAYARAMAIAH
     D/O N. BALAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.27, 7TH MAIN,
     19TH CROSS, KARAGAPPA GARDEN
     SRI M. CHINNAIAH ROAD
     SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR
     BENGALURU-560027

6.   SMT. SHARADA
     W/O SHIVAKUMAR
     D/O LATE N BALAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.6, 2ND A MAIN ROAD,
     ITTAMADU, BSK 3RD STAGE
     BENGALURU-560085.

7.   SRI B. CHAMARAJ
     S/O LATE N BALAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
     R/O NO.47/1, SWASTHI ROAD
     SHATHINAGAR
     BENGALURU-560027

8.   SMT GIRIJAMMA
     W/O DIL BAHADUR
     D/O LATE S. MUNISWAMY
     AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.2, 4TH CROSS,
                           -3-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:5410
                                    MFA No. 5076 of 2021




     G.G. ROAD, EJIPURA
     BENGALURU-560047.

9.   SMT. GOVINDAMMA
     W/O VENKATASWAMY
     D/O LATE SHAMANNA
     AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.65, 2ND CROSS
     NEAR SADGURU ASHRAMA
     NELLURAHALLI WHITEFIELD
     BENGALURU-560066.

10. SMT. PADMA
    W/O LATE MANI
    D/O LATE MADAPPA
    AND LATE MUNILAKSHMAMMA
    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
    R/AT NO.11, SWATHI CROSS ROAD
    BHEEMANNA GARDEN
    SHANTHINAGAR
    BENGALURU-560027.

11. SMT. RENUKA
    W/O M. CHANDRASHEKAR
    D/O LATE MADAPPA AND
    LATE MUNILAKSHMAMMA
    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
    R/AT NO.1298, 14TH CROSS,
    2ND STAGE, GIRINAGAR
    BENGALURU-560085

12. SMT. JANANI W/O SHASHIDHAR
    D/O LATE MADAPPA AND
    LATE MUNILAKSHMAMMA
    AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
    R/AT NO.23/8, LAKSHMINARAYANA NILAYA
    3RD CROSS, 5TH MAIN ROAD
    DWARAKANAGR BSK IIIRD STAGE
    HOSAKRE HALLI, BENGALURU-560027.

13. SMT. NAGARATHNA
    W/O M. CHANDRASHEKAR
                             -4-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC:5410
                                      MFA No. 5076 of 2021




      D/O LATE MADAPPA AND
      LATE MUNILAKSHMAMMA
      AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
      R/O NO.13, SWASTHI ROAD,
      BENGALURU-560027.

14. SMT. VIJAYA W/O LATE GOPIKRISHNA
    AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

15. SMT. CHAITHRA D/O LATE GOPIKRISHNA
    AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

16. SMT. CHAITHANYA D/O LATE GOPIKRISHNA
    AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

17. SRI MADHUSUDHAN S/O LATE GOPIKRISHNA
    AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,

      RESPONDENTS NO.14 TO 17 ARE
      R/O. NO.8, SWASTHI MAIN ROAD,
      NEXT TO RAJARAJESHWARI TEMPLE,
      SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027.

18. THE MANAGER
    KARNATAKA BANK LTD.,
    KASAVANAHALLI BRANCH
    BENGALURU-560035.
                                             ...RESPONDENTS
      THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF
CPC,1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2021          PASSED
ON I.A. NO.2    IN O.S.NO.2578/2017      ON THE FILE OF THE
XXV    ADDITIONAL   CITY   CIVIL   AND    SESSIONS   JUDGE,
BENGALURU CITY (CCH NO.23), ALLOWING THE           I.A. NO.2
FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION
151 OF CPC.


      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                -5-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:5410
                                           MFA No. 5076 of 2021




                           JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the Trial Court while allowing the application-I.A.No.2 filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. imposed the condition directing the plaintiffs to give undertaking to compensate for injury or loss that would cause defendant No.2 in case, the plaintiffs fail to get the relief of partition and declaration as prayed in the suit. Learned counsel for the appellants would contend that imposition of said condition would cause prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs and hence, the said condition has to be modified. Learned counsel for the appellants not disputes the other observations made by the Trial Court that the order will not bind on the defendant No.18 with whom the defendant No.2 has already obtained loan by creating mortgage.

3. Having considered the grounds urged, defendant No.2 has already obtained loan from defendant No.18 by mortgaging the property and suit is filed for partition and separate possession by the plaintiffs and the condition imposed by the Trial Court is that, if the plaintiffs are unsuccessful in -6- NC: 2024:KHC:5410 MFA No. 5076 of 2021 getting the relief of partition and declaration, they have to compensate for injury or loss that would cause to defendant No.2. The fact that defendant No.2 had availed loan from defendant No.18 is taken note by the Trial Court. The Trial Court has also taken note of the nature of the suit filed by the plaintiffs and relief is granted restraining the defendant No.2 from alienating the suit schedule property in favour of third parties, pending disposal of the suit.

4. In view of suit being filed, an order of temporary injunction not to alienate the property is granted and having taken note of the said fact into consideration, condition is imposed to give an undertaking to compensate for injury or loss that would cause defendant No.2, in case the plaintiffs fail to get the relief of partition and declaration, I do not find any error committed by the Trial Court in imposing such a condition, taking note of the relief what has been sought and the Trial Court has also taken note of the fact that defendant No.2 had availed loan from defendant No.18 by mortgaging the property. Therefore, the Trial Court has not committed any error in imposing such condition and I do not find any ground to modify the order as claimed by the appellants. -7-

NC: 2024:KHC:5410 MFA No. 5076 of 2021 With these observations, the appeal is dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28