Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Abdul Bari.D.M vs State Of Kerala on 16 July, 2012

Author: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

Bench: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

       

  

  

 
 
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

       THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2012/28TH ASHADHA 1934

                        WP(C).No. 15604 of 2012 (A)
                           ---------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
---------------

          ABDUL BARI.D.M, AGED 52 YEARS
          S/O MUHAMMED, DARUL RAHMATH, KUMBALAM POST
          KOCHI 682506

          BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH

RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------

       1. STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
          MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

       2. DISTRICT POLICE CIMPLAINT AUTHORITY,
          ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD POST
          682030 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

       3. CHAIRMAN,
          DISTRICT POLICE COMPLAINT AUTHORITY
          ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD POST, 682030

       4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NARCOTIC CELL,
           KOCHI CITY, ERNAKULAM

         * ADDL. R5. IMPLEADED

          * ADDL. R5 PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
             DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
            (*ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 16/07/2012 IN
              IA 9683/2012.)

          BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RAJASREE

        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 19-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15604 of 2012 (A)

                            APPENDIX




PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS




EXT. P1    TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY THE
           PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15-03-2012

EXT. P2    TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10-04-2012 VIDE
           REFERENCE NUMBER 29/PTN/NC/12 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

EXT. P3    TRUE COPY OF THE LAYER NOTICE SENT BY THE PETITIONER
           BEFORE THE 4THA RESPONDENT

EXT. P4    TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE
           2ND RESPONDENT VIDE REFERENCE NUMBER PCA 02/2011
           DATED 13-04-2012

EXT. P5    TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEMS PUBLISHED IN THE INDO
           ASIAN NEWS SERVICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED DATED
           18-11-2011

EXT.P6:    TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE
           PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 05.07.2012.



RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :         NIL




                                                //TRUE COPY//


                                                P.A. TO JUDGE




dlk



                 T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
         --------------------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C)No.15604 Of 2012
         --------------------------------------------------
           DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JULY, 2012

                          JUDGMENT

The petitioner is seeking for a direction to the respondents to transfer all proceedings pertaining to Exhibit P1 complaint preferred by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent to any other authority outside Ernakulam District.

2. The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition stating that a complaint as per Exhibit P1 has been lodged before the 2nd respondent dated 15.3.2012. Various details have been explained in paragraphs 6 to 8, which show that the petitioner has got an apprehension that he will not get relief from the said authority.

3. After the filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner has filed I.A.9683/12 for impleading the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram as additional 5th respondent and I.A.No.9684/12 for a direction to the additional 5th respondent to consider Exhibit P6 application for transfer of the complaint to any other authority. W.P.(C)No.15604/12 -2-

I am not going into the merits of the matter, since the petitioner has approached the Government in the matter. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of directing the additional 5th respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P6 within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition by the petitioner.

Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn