Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Mayuri Sunil Thakur Minor Thru Father ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 4 December, 2018

Author: Bharati H. Dangre

Bench: S.C. Dharmadhikari, Bharati H. Dangre

                                                        909-wp-8203-2018


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        WRIT PETITION NO.8203 OF 2018

 Mayuri Sunil Thakur
 Through Father & Natural Gurdian
 Shri.Sunil Thakur                                        ...Petitioner
       V/s.
 State of Maharashtra & Ors.                              ...Respondents
                                 ----
 Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner.

 Mr.S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                 ----
                          CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
                                    SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
                                DATE    : 04th DECEMBER 2018

 P.C.:

1. Leave to amend to correct the name of the Scrutiny Committee in the title. The second respondent now shall be termed as Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar.

2. Heard both sides.

3. Perused the Writ Petition. Since the petitioner's claim is pending before respondent No.2-Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee and it being over burdened, it could not decide it expeditiously, the fourth respondent should N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2018 23:55:11 ::: 909-wp-8203-2018 not have precipitated the matter by threatening to cancel the admission of the petitioner or deny her the opportunity to appear for the examination.

4. Once the Committee was unable to dispose of the matter and the petitioner has no control over its proceedings, we expect the college not to deny the petitioner such an opportunity. Let the petitioner appear for the examination, which commences on 17th December 2018 subject to the outcome of the proceedings before the Scrutiny Committee. In the event, an adverse order is passed, then, the same shall not be acted upon for a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of its communication to the petitioner. In the event, the petitioner does not obtain any orders from the higher forum, then, all consequences in law shall follow. No equities can be claimed by the petitioner and our order does not mean that we have accepted the claim of the petitioner on merits.

5 With these clarifications, the Writ Petition is disposed of.




 6                  All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this

      N.S. Kamble                                                       page 2 of 3



::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018                      ::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2018 23:55:11 :::
                                                         909-wp-8203-2018

 order.



7. Stand over to 31st May 2019 for compliance.




 (SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.)                  (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)




      N.S. Kamble                                                      page 3 of 3



::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2018                     ::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2018 23:55:11 :::