Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Madanlal Khanna vs Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. on 28 June, 2013

                             Central Information Commission
              Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,
                          Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066
                          Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931

                                                              Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/003084
                                                                               June 28, 2013



Appellant                        :       Shri Madanlal

Respondents                      :        Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL)
 
Date of Hearing                  :       27.06.2013


                                             ORDER

The present appeal filed by Shri Madanlal against BCCL, Dhanbad was taken up  for   hearing   on   27.06.2013   when   the   Respondents   were   present   through   Shri   A.K.  Sengupta, CGM (Washeries) and Dr. A.K. Singh, Sr. Manager (P). The Appellant was  present in person.

Facts of the case:

2. The Appellant filed his RTI application dated 19.04.2011 with the CPIO, BCCL,  Dhandbad, wherein he made a mention of a letter dated 27.09.2008 written by Asst. 

Secretary, Mines & Mineral Department, Government of Jharkhand to the CMD stating  that "immediate arrangements for stowing of sand in the unstable areas be made so that  Jharia and the fires approaching Jhaira town be brought under control. A report of the  CIC/SS/A/2012/003084 Page 1 of 5 2 work done may be sent to the State Government." In this context, the Appellant wanted to  know following information:

"1) full details of the sand stowing done as per the above letter
2) A copy of the report on the work thus done sent to the Jharkhand Government as  requested by them."

3. The   CPIO   vide   his   letter   dated   17.06.2011   furnished   a   detailed   reply   to   the  Appellant corresponding to his RTI application. 

4. The Appellant, being dissatisfied with the reply given by the CPIO, directly filed  an appeal before the Commission on 15.09.2011.

5. Acting   on   this   appeal,   the   Commission   issued   an   order   dated   08.05.2012,  wherein it, while advising the Appellant to file his first appeal with the Appellate Authority,  also directed the Appellate Authority to pass a speaking order on receipt of first appeal  from the Appellant. 

6. In compliance with the order of the Commission, the Appellate Authority passed  an order dated 09.06.2012 directing the Environment Department and Safety Department  of BCCL to furnish the specific information to the Appellant. 

7. Since   the   Appellant   did   not   receive   any   information   despite   the   order   of   the  Appellate Authority, he filed the present appeal before the Commission. Decision:

8. During the hearing, the Respondents inform the Commission that they, pursuant  to the direction of the Appellate Authority, had collected the information from the GM  2 (Environment) and the GM (Safety) and had conveyed the same to the Appellant vide  letters dated 16.06.2012 & 22.06.2012. Through letter dated 16.06.2012, the Appellant  was provided with quantity of sand stowed for stabilization purpose for the last 5 years of  different areas of BCCL mines, while by letter dated 22.06.2012, he was informed that  "as per record available, the reply of the letter no. 1162 dt. 27.08.08 has not been sent to  Dy.   Secretary,   Mines   &   Minerals   Deptt.,   Jharkhand   Govt.   as   sand   stowing   is   not  required."   The   Appellant,   present   during   the   hearing,   however,   denies   receipt   of   the  above mentioned letters/replies from the Respondents. The Respondents then hands  over a copy of said replies to the Appellant at the hearing itself, while also mentioning  that said replies were sent through speed post. The Appellant, on perusing the replies,  states   that   information   given   is   not   correct.   He   says   that   he   wants   to   know   the  measures/steps being taken by the pubic authority for prevention of underground fire  from spreading in Jharia town.  The Respondents then make a mention of 'Master Plan'  on   this   matter   which   is   being   implemented   by   Jharia   Rehabilitation   Development  Authority. According to them, a committee had been set up in the year 2005 to look into  this issue. 

9. On   consideration   of   the   submission   above   and   on   perusal   of   records,   the  Commission   observes   that   the   factual   information   has   been   communicated   to   the  Appellant in respect of his RTI request. However, considering the Appellant's complaint  that   he   has   not   received   the   replies   dated   16.06.2012   &   22.06.2012   from   the  Respondents, the CPIO is hereby directed to once again send copies of said replies to  the Appellant. 

10. Appeal is disposed of with the above directions. CIC/SS/A/2012/003084 Page 3 of 5 4 (Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner Authenticated by (D.C. Singh) Deputy Registrar Address to the parties:

1. Shri Madanlal Lal Khanna Secretary  Jharia Coalfields Bachao Samiti Main Road, P.O. Jharia 828 111 Dhanbad
2. The Central Public Information Officer Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) Headquarters office Koyla Bhavan, Koyala Nagar Level­VI Dhanbad 826005 Jharkhand
3. The Appellate Authority/CGM (Oprn.) Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) Headquarters office Koyla Bhavan, Koyala Nagar Level­VI Dhanbad 826005 Jharkhand 4 CIC/SS/A/2012/003084 Page 5 of 5