Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Gauhati High Court

Manohari Das vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors on 1 April, 2019

Author: Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench: Kalyan Rai Surana

                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010020522015




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C) 5288/2015

         1:MANOHARI DAS
         S/O LT. RATNESWAR DAS VILL- HALAPAKURI P.O. HOWLY DIST. BARPETA,
         ASSAM.

         VERSUS

         1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
         REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
         PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI-3.

         2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
          FINANCE DEPARTMENT
          GOVT. OF ASSAM
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-6.

         3:THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          PWRD AUDIT BRANCH
         ASSAM CIVIL SECRETARIAT
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI -6.

         4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER ROADS
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
          CHANDMARI
          GUWAHATI -3.

         5:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
         A and E
         ASSAM
          MAIDAMGAON
          BELTOLA GUWAHATI - 781029.

         6:THE SR. ACCOUNTS OFFICER
                                                                                          Page No.# 2/2

              C/O OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A and E
              ASSAM
              MAIDAMGAON
              BELTOLA
              GUWAHATI - 781029.

             7:THE TREASURY OFFICER
              BARPETA TREASURY C/O OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
             GENERAL A and E
             ASSAM
              MAIDAMGAON
              BELTOL
              GUWAHATI - 781029

Advocate for the Petitioner    : MS.P DUTTA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD




                                    BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

                                              ORDER

01.04.2019 Heard Mr. N.K. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Upon instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired about two years back and therefore the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed on being rendered infructuous.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant