Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Principal Commissioner Cgst And ... vs Texmo Pipes And Products Ltd. on 18 March, 2025

Author: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari

Bench: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar

          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:7144




                                                              1                              CEA-64-2019
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT INDORE
                                                    BEFORE
                             HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
                                                      &
                                 HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
                                                  ON THE 18th OF MARCH, 2025
                                            CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No. 64 of 2019
                                PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
                                                     Versus
                                         TEXMO PIPES AND PRODUCTS LTD.
                           Appearance:
                                   Shri Prasanna Prasad - Advocate for the appellant.

                                                                  ORDER

Per: Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari During pendency of this appeal, vide order dated 06.08.2024 the Revenue Department, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in exercise of powers conferred under Section 35 R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 has enhanced the monetary limit for filing the appeal against the order of CESTAT in a High Court as well as Supreme Court.

2. In the present appeal the valuation is less than Rs.2 Crores, therefore, this present appeal is liable to be withdrawn. Hence, the appellant has filed an application i.e., I.A. No.11239/2024 seeking withdrawal of this appeal.

3. In view of above, I.A. No.11239/2024 is allowed. As a consequence, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is however made clear Signature Not Verified Signed by: TEJPRAKASH VYAS Signing time: 18-03-2025 17:17:51 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:7144 2 CEA-64-2019 that the question of law raised in this appeal shall remain open to be raised at the appropriate stage.





                           (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI)                   (SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR)
                                     JUDGE                                           JUDGE
                           Tej




Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TEJPRAKASH
VYAS
Signing time: 18-03-2025
17:17:51