Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 6]

Chattisgarh High Court

Fataka Vyapari Sangh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 September, 2017

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                            1

                                                                                NAFR

              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                 WPC No. 2422 of 2017

        Fataka Vyapari Sangh, An Association Registered under the Societies
        Registration Act 1973, Having Registration No. C G State 5889 Office at Plot
        No 1, Gulmohar Park, Laxman Nagar, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel Ward No.
        18, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh : Through its Secretary Vinod
        Kumar Sahu S/o Late Babu Lal Sahu Aged about 56 years, R/o Banjari
        Road, Mandir Ke Pass, Sadar Bazar Ward Raipur Chhattisgarh.

                                                                         ---- Petitioner

                                        Versus

     1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya
        Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

     2. District Magistrate, Office of the Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                                     ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Ms. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A. for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/09/17 Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' application for renewal of licences is pending before the licensing authority / respondent No. 02 since 23.11.2016, even though the petitioners have deposited the requisite license fee. The petitioners' have made several representations before the respondent No. 02- District Magistrate, Raipur but it has not been considered and decided till date.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Be that as it may, the State authority is directed to consider and decide the petitioners' application expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this 2 Court has not made any opinion on the merits of the case.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka