Delhi High Court - Orders
Alankit Forex India Limited vs Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central ... on 26 May, 2023
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
Bench: Rajiv Shakdher
$~52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7401/2023
ALANKIT FOREX INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate.
versus
DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 28,
DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing
Counsel with Mr Akshat Singh, Jr.
Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
ORDER
% 26.05.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM Appl.28790/2023
1. Allowed, subject to the petitioner filing legible copies of the annexures, at least three days before the next date of hearing. W.P.(C) 7401/2023 & CM Appl.28789/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief]
2. This writ petition concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13.
3. The record shows that on account of search conducted on 18.10.2019 qua Alankit Group, proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "Act"] have been triggered against the petitioner.
W.P.(C) 7401/2023 page 1 of 3 This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2023 at 08:44:55 3.1 The record also discloses that the assessment order was passed on 29.03.2023 followed by penalty notice dated 03.04.2023 issued under Section 274 read with section 271 (1)(c) of the Act.
4. The petitioner is "other person" in terms of Section 153C of the Act]. The petitioner's Assessing Officer (AO), we are told, prepared a satisfaction note on 28.02.2022, which according to the counsel for the petitioner, is also construed as a date of search [see Commissioner of Income Tax vs. R.R. J. Securities Limited, (2016) 380 ITR 612].
5. The record also shows that under Section 153C of the Act, which was issued to the petitioner is dated 28.12.2021.
6. Mr Sumit Lalchandani, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the proceedings triggered against the petitioner are time-barred having regard to the fact that the first assessment order would comment from AY 2022-23.
6.1 In other words, 10-year period will end in AY 2013-14.
7. Issue notice.
7.1 Mr Abhishek Maratha, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/revenue.
8. Counter-affidavit will be filed within eight weeks. 8.1 Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed at least five days before the next date of hearing.
9. List the matter on 17.10.2023.
10. In the meanwhile, no precipitate action will be taken against the petitioner.
W.P.(C) 7401/2023 page 2 of 3 This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2023 at 08:44:55
11. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MAY 26, 2023 / tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
W.P.(C) 7401/2023 page 3 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/09/2023 at 08:44:55