Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Sumit Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Others on 10 August, 2015

Bench: Rajiv Sharma, Sureshwar Thakur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA .

Cr. W.P. 5 of 2015 Date of Decision: 10.8.2015 Sumit Sharma ...Petitioner of Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents ________________________________________________________ rt Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Parmod Thakur, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State.

Mr. B.C. Negi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.

Mr. Raman Prashar, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.

Per Rajiv Sharma Judge (oral) In sequel to the directions issued by this Court on 9.7.2015, Mr. Daljeet Kumar Thakur, D.I.G. Police (CID) has produced the report in a sealed cover, which was opened in the presence of parties. We have perused the status report. We accept the report.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:43:44 :::HCHP 2

2. Accordingly, respondent No. 1 is directed to take .

consequential action based on the status report against the erring officers/officials, who were involved in the incident dated 23.3.2015 within a period of four months from today.

We place on record our appreciation for the promptness of shown by Mr. Daljeet Kumar Thakur, DIG (CID) for conducting the inquiry within the period stipulated by this Court.

3. rt Mr. Ramesh Thakur, learned Assistant Advocate General is permitted to hand over the compact disc to this Court after obtaining proper signatures on part-B of the file.

The earlier status report filed on the affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Shimla is rejected.

4. In view of this, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.

(Rajiv Sharma), Judge (Sureshwar Thakur), Judge August 10, 2015 (kalpana) 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:43:44 :::HCHP