Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Gail India Ltd vs Uco Bank & Anr on 20 April, 2023

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                            $~4
                            *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                            +     CS(COMM) 276/2016

                                  GAIL INDIA LTD                                         ..... Plaintiff
                                                      Through:      Mr. Siddhnat Garg & Ms. Samya
                                                                    Chatterjee, Advocates with Mr.
                                                                    Mrinal Singh, Manager (GAIL) &
                                                                    Mr. N.L. Ganapathi, AOR.
                                                                    [M:-9810935911]

                                                                versus

                                  UCO BANK & ANR                                     ..... Defendants
                                               Through:             Mr. D.S. Chauhan & Ms. Ruchi
                                                                    Singh, Advocates for D-1. [M:-
                                                                    9810310142].
                                                                    Ms. Amrita Mishra, Advocate for
                                                                    D-2. [M:-9999762400]
                            CORAM:
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                      ORDER

% 20.04.2023 I.A. 7396/2023(Application on behalf of the plaintiff for condonation of delay in filing reply to I.A. 20734/2022)

1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff for condonation of delay in filing the reply to I.A. 20734/2022. There is no objection to the request.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the reply is taken on record.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:21.04.2023 11:47:30 CS(COMM) 276/2016 Page 1 of 2

CS(COMM) 276/2016 & I.A. 20734/2022 At the request of Mr. D.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the defendant No. 1, to which there is no objection, list on 07.08.2023.

PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 20, 2023 'pv'/ Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:21.04.2023 11:47:30 CS(COMM) 276/2016 Page 2 of 2