Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajiv vs State Of Haryana on 7 January, 2015

Author: Sabina

Bench: Sabina

            Crl. Appeal No. S-549-SB of 2007 (O&M)                                   -1-

                      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh


                                            Crl. Appeal No. S-549-SB of 2007 (O&M)
                                            Date of Decision: 07.01.2015


            Rajiv                                                      ......Appellant


                                                 Versus


            State of Haryana                                           .......Respondent


            CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

            Present:            Mr. C.R.Olla, Advocate for
                                Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate
                                for the appellant.

                                Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

                                     ****

            SABINA, J.

Appellant had faced the trial qua commission of offence punishable under Section 186, 216, 224, 225, 332, 341, 353, 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short) in FIR No. 144 dated 20.8.1998, registered at Police Station Bawani Khera. Trial Court vide judgment/order dated 11.1.2007/12.1.2007 ordered the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 332, 353, 341, 395 read with Section 397 IPC and 224 IPC. Hence, the present appeal by the appellant.

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the appellant has not challenged the conviction of the appellant under Section 332, 353, 341, 395 read with Section 397 IPC and 224 IPC but has submitted that appellant has undergone more than six years of actual sentence out of seven years and the sentence qua imprisonment of the appellant be reduced to the period already GURPREET SINGH 2015.01.08 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Crl. Appeal No. S-549-SB of 2007 (O&M) -2- undergone by him. Appellant is the only bread earner of the family.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, it would be just and expedient to reduce the sentence qua imprisonment of the appellant to the period already undergone by him.

Accordingly, conviction of the appellant under Section 332, 353, 341, 395 read with Section 397 IPC and 224 IPC is maintained. However, sentence qua imprisonment of the appellant is reduced to the period already undergone by him.

Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

(SABINA) JUDGE January 07, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.01.08 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh