Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Binu Dutta vs The State Bank Of India And 4 Ors on 15 June, 2020

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam, Hitesh Kumar Sarma

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010286302019




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C) 8773/2019

            1:BINU DUTTA
            W/O- LATE KALYAN DUTTA, FLAT NO. G-2, 2ND FLOOR, HOUSE NO. 20,
            RAJAT KAMAL PATH, RGB ROAD, GUWAHATI-24.

            VERSUS

            1:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
            REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, RETAIL ASSETS CENTRAL
            PROCESSING CENTER.

            2:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
             REP. BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
             RACPC
             GUWAHATI.

            3:THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
             REP. BY CHIEF MANAGER
             RACPC
             GUWAHATI

            4:STATE BANK OF INDIA
             NEW GUWAHATI BRANCH
             REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER RETAIL ASSETS CENTRAL PROCESSING
            CENTRE (RACPC)
             SWAGOTA SQUARE
             4TH FLOOR
            ABC POINT
             GUWAHATI-5.

            5:THE RECOVERY OFFICER
             DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
             GUWAHAT

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P K GOSWAMI
                                                                                    Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K NANDI




                                  BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA

                                            ORDER

15.06.2020 Suman Shyam, J.

Mr. B. P. Borah, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, seeks adjournment in this case for six weeks on the ground that the learned senior counsel Mr. P. K. Goswami appearing in this matter is unavailable due to personal reasons.

Mr. K. K. Nandi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4, submits that he has no objection if the prayer for adjournment is allowed by this Court.

In view of above and on the request of the petitioner's counsel, this writ petition stands adjourned for six weeks.

List accordingly.

                                          JUDGE                               JUDGE



Comparing Assistant