Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Hamza vs Muhammadkutty on 12 March, 2014

N
CHAMBER MATTER                                          SECTION IIB


              S U P R E M E    C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                    REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO(s). 87 OF 2014
                                       IN
                          CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 268/2007

HAMZA                                                  Petitioner(s)

                   VERSUS

MUHAMMADKUTTY                                          Respondent(s)

(With application for condonation of delay in      filing   review    petition   and
office report)


Date: 12/03/2014    This Petition was circulated today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK
          HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA



                                  By Circulation



             UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R
|                                                                                      |
|Delay condoned.                                                                       |
|The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.                        |
|                                                                                      |
|[KALYANI GUPTA]                         | |[SHARDA KAPOOR]                             |
|COURT MASTER                            | |COURT MASTER                                |


[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL) NO. 87 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 268 OF 2007 | HAMZA |..... |PETITIONER | | | |VERSUS | | MUHAMMADKUTTY @ MANI & ORS. |..... |RESPONDENT | O R D E R Delay condoned.

We have gone through the grounds urged in the review petition and the documents annexed thereto. We are not inclined to review our judgment referred to in this petition. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

......................J [A.K. PATNAIK] ......................J [GYAN SUDHA MISRA] NEW DELHI MARCH 12, 2014.