Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Texaco Overseas Pvt Ltd vs Acit, Circle 25(1) & Anr. on 21 August, 2020

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Sanjeev Narula

$~2
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+       W.P. (C) 5519/2020
        TEXACO OVERSEAS PVT LTD                ...... Petitioner
                     Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate.

                            versus

        ACIT, CIRCLE 25(1) & ANR.                    ...... Respondent
                        Through:  Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Senior
                                  Standing Counsel with Mr. Pratayash
                                  Gupta, Ms. Nupur Sharma and
                                  Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocates.
%                                         Date of Decision: 21st August, 2020
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
                                JUDGMENT

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM APPL. 19883/2020 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P. (C) 5519/2020

1. The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed for refund of Rs.1,92,820/- determined vide order dated 06th July, 2019 under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1961') for the assessment year 2017-18 along with the interest under Section 244A of the Act, 1961 as well as for deleting the demand of Rs.85,91,260/- for the assessment year 2018-19 W.P. (C) 5519/2020 Page 1 of 2 determined vide order dated 13th June, 2019 under Section 143(1) of the Act, 1961, on the basis of subsequent rectification order dated 19 th November, 2019 under Section 154 of the Act, 1961.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent cannot overlook the subsequent refund determined under Section 154 of the Act, 1961 on the ground that it had adjusted the same against previous demand, which was later on either reduced to nil or found wrongly uploaded in the computer system.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite rectification applications dated 28th July, 2020, 6th August, 2020 and 11th August, 2020 under Section 154 of the Act, 1961 the respondents have till date not granted refund of Rs. 1,92,820/-.

5. Issue notice.

6. Mr. Abhishek Maratha, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

7. After some arguments, with the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the petitioner's rectification applications dated 28 th July, 2020, 6th August, 2020 and 11th August, 2020 under Section 154 of the Act, 1961 within six weeks in accordance with law. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

MANMOHAN, J SANJEEV NARULA, J AUGUST 21, 2020/sb W.P. (C) 5519/2020 Page 2 of 2