Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Narshibhai Virjibhai Akbari ... vs Registrar - High Court Of Gujarat & 2 on 29 November, 2017

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

                   C/SCA/11705/2014                                                   ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11705 of 2014

         ==========================================================
               NARSHIBHAI VIRJIBHAI AKBARI (N.V.AKABARI)....Petitioner(s)
                                      Versus
              REGISTRAR - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR VILAS G GOSWAMY, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 3
         LAW OFFICER BRANCH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
         MS TRUSHA K PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

                                           Date : 29/11/2017
                                              ORAL ORDER

On   28th  November,   2017,   this   Court   passed   below   quoted  order: 

"1. Learned   advocate   for   the   petitioner   is   not   present.   Any   request   for   pass   over   or   adjournment   is   also   not   made.   Learned   advocate for the petitioner has neglected hearing of the petition. 
2. Therefore,  the petition deserves to be rejected  on ground  of   non­prosecution.   However,   in   view   of   the   fact   that   the   learned   advocate for the respondent has filed leave note, benefit is granted to   the   learned   advocate   for   the   petitioner   and   proceedings   are   adjourned to tomorrow i.e. 29th  November, 2017 with clarification   that if learned advocates for the petitioner and respondent are not   present   then,   the   Court   will   be   constrained   to   pass   appropriate   order. 
3. Having regard to the fact that the petition is pending since   2014 and is rotating on admission board for last three years and the   petition is adjourned 35 times, further time will not be granted and   appropriate order will be pass on first call. 
Page 1 of 2
HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Nov 29 23:50:09 IST 2017 C/SCA/11705/2014 ORDER
4. S.O. to 29th November, 2017.  List the petition within first   five matters."

However,   today,   learned   advocate   for   the   respondent   has  filed leave note and learned advocate for the petitioner has also  filed sick note."

S.O. to 4th December, 2017. 

(K.M.THAKER, J.) ali Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Nov 29 23:50:09 IST 2017