Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Chattisgarh High Court

G.Ravi Raja vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 94 ... on 8 January, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                           1

                                                                                NAFR

               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                WPC No. 428 of 2014

     1. G.Ravi Raja S/o Late Shri K.G. Achari Aged About 39 Years R/o Plot No.
        143, Maitri Kunj, Risali Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai, Distt. Durg C.G.

                                                                        ---- Petitioner

                                       Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Commerce And
        Industry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, C.G.

     2. Shri S. Swaminathan Secretary, Sri Shankara Education Society, Bhilai,
        Street No. 3, Sector-10, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, C.G.

     3. Sri Shankara Education Society, Through President, Bhilai Street No. 3,
        Sector-10, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, C.G.

     4. Registrar, Firm And Societies, Block No.1, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan,
        Naya Raipur, C.G.

                                                                      ---- Respondent



For Petitioner                        None
For Respondent/State                  Shri Rajesh Singh, Dy. Govt. Adv.
For Respondent No.2&3                 Shri Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate


                                 Order On Board
                                       By
                            Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

08/01/2019

1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call.

2) In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-


                                                                     Judge
Gowri                                                       Prashant Kumar Mishra