Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Lokendra vs Niper, Hyderabad on 19 October, 2022

Author: Heeralal Samariya

Bench: Heeralal Samariya

    केन्द्रीय सच
               ू ना आयोग

                           Central Information Commission
                               बाबा गंगनाथ मागग ,मुननरका
                            Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                            नई निल्ली, New Delhi - 110067

 नितीय अपील संख्या/Second Appeal No.: CIC/NIPHY/A/2021/627957

 Lokendra                                             .....अपीलकताग /Appellant

                                     VERSUS/बनाम



 Public Information Officer Under RTI,
 National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education &
 Research (Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers),
 Balanagar, Hyderabad-500037
 (Telangana).

                                                        ...प्रनतवािीगण/Respondents

Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

  RTI application filed on           :   11.05.2021
  CPIO replied on                    :   17.06.2021
  First appeal filed on              :   14.06.2021
  First Appellate Authority order    :   30.06.2021
  Second Appeal received at CIC      :   05.07.2021
  Date of Hearing                    :   18.10.2022
  Date of Decision                   :   18.10.2022


                      सूचना आयुक्त   : श्री हीरालाल सामररया
               Information Commissioner:    Shri Heeralal Samariya


  Information sought

:

The Appellant sought following information:
Page 1 of 4
• PIO furnished reply, vide letter dated 17.06.2021, as under:
• Dissatisfied with the response received from PIO, Appellant filed First Appeal, vide letter dated 14.06.2021.
• The FAA vide order dated 30.06.2021 held as under:
• Written submission has been received from the Respondent vide letter dated 11.10.2022 as under :
Page 2 of 4 Page 3 of 4
Grounds for Second Appeal:
The PIO has not provided correct information to the Appellant.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present: -
Appellant: Absent Respondent: Absent.
Written submission received from the Respondent has been on record for perusal.
An email dated 11.10.2022 has been received from the Appellant whereby expressed his willingness to withdraw the instant matter.
Decision:
In view of the request made by the Appellant, instant Second Appeal is closed as withdrawn.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Heeralal Samariya (हीरालाल सामररया) Information Commissioner (सूचना आयुक्त) Authenticated true copy (अनिप्रमानणतसत्यानपतप्रनत) Ram Parkash Grover (रामप्रकाशग्रोवर) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011-26180514 Page 4 of 4