Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Ashok Saini S/O Dindayal B/C Mali vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 May, 2020

Author: Ashok Kumar Gaur

Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                     BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3032/2020

1.       Ashok Saini S/o Dindayal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
         Pragwal Mohalla Rampur Ps Bansoor Police Dist. Bhiwadi
         (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
2.       Mahendra Kumar S/o Keharsingh, Aged About 30 Years,
         R/o Johadi Mohalla Rampur Ps Bansoor Police Dist.
         Bhiwadi (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ravi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.FR Meena, Public Prosecutor -

present in the Court HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order 08/05/2020 Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioners through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present in the Court.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submitted that the accused-petitioners have been arrested in a case arising out of FIR No.286/2019 registered at Police Station Bansoor for the offence under Sections 332, 333 and 353 IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submitted that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 12 th March, 2020 and after investigation, the Police has filed challan under Sections 332, (Downloaded on 08/05/2020 at 08:47:32 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3032/2020] 333 and 353 IPC as well as under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

Learned counsel submitted that nature of the allegations, levelled against the accused-petitioners, is not of that serious nature and as such learned counsel submitted that the accused- petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

Learned counsel further submitted that the accused- petitioners are not required for any purpose by the authorities now.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the contention raised by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and the injury report of the injured Rajesh Kumar and the nature of allegation and injuries sustained by the injured, as well as taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, the present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (i) Ashok Saini S/o Dindayal and (ii) Mahendra Kumar S/o Keharsingh shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of alike amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J Preeti Asopa /Himanshu (Downloaded on 08/05/2020 at 08:47:32 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)