Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Pranay Prakash Singh And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 December, 2025

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

2025:BHC-AS:56776                                                609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1564 OF 2025
                    1. Saurabh Eknath Ghule                                    ...Applicants
                    2. Vinay Prakash Shingi
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                ...Respondent

                                                 WITH
                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4344/2025
                                                  IN
                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1564 OF 2025
                    Mohammed Irfan Abdul Rehman Momin                          ...Applicant
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                ...Respondent

                                                 WITH
                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1570 OF 2025

                    1. Pranay Prakash Shingi                                   ...Applicants
                    2. Sushil Eknath Ghule
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                ...Respondent

                                                WITH
                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. NO.4335 OF 2025
                                                 IN
                           ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1570 OF 2025
                    Mohammed Irfan Abdul Rehman Momin           ...Applicant
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Anr.                 ...Respondent

                                                 WITH
                             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2025

                    Abhijit Vasant Shende                                      ...Applicant
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                ...Respondents




                                                  Page 1 of 15
                    Dusane

                ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                         ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                     609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




                              WITH
              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4342 OF 2025
                               IN
          ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2025

Mohammed Irfan Abdul Rehman Momin                                 ...Applicant
      Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                       ...Respondent


Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae), a/w
Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)
Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Jugal Kanani              for
Applicants in ABA 1564 of 2025.
Mr. Harshad V. Nimbalkar, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Satyam H.
Nimbalkar i/by Mr. Ashishek U. Arote, for Applicant in ABA 1651
of 2025.
Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, i/by Ms. Keral Mehta for Applicants in ABA
No. 1570 of 2025.
Mr. Santosh Budhwani a/w Ms. Yasmin Shaikh i/by Yasmin Shaikh
for Applicant in IAs
Mr. S.A. Karmakar, APP for State.
Ms. S.M, Yadav, APP for State.
IO, Mr. Santosh Khetmalas, E.O.W., Pune City, present.


                               CORAM:     MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                               DATED :    22nd December 2025
P.C.:


 1.       Heard on earlier dates Mr. Ponda, learned Senior Counsel

 appearing for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application

 No.1564 of 2025 (Accused No. 4 and 5), Mr. Mundargi, learned

 Counsel for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1570

 of 2025 (Accused No. 1 and 2) and Mr. Nimbalkar, learned Senior




                                     Page 2 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                            ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                    609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




 Counsel appearing for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail

 Application No. 1651 of 2025 (Accused No.3), Ms. Yadav, learned

 APP and Mr. Karmakar, learned APP, Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar,

 learned Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Vaibhav Ugale, learned Counsel

 appointed as amici curiae to represent interest of the flat

 purchasers and Mr. Budhwani, learned Counsel for the Intervenor.



 2.       By these Applications filed under Section 482 of the

 Bharatiya       Nagarik       Suraksha   Sanhita,      2023      ("BNSS"),        the

 Applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.

 No.922 of 2024 registered with Lonikand Police Station, Pune City,

 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 read with

 Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"), Sections 3,5, 8

 and 13 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 ("MOFA")

 and under Sections 3 of Maharashrta Protection of Interest of

 Depositors, Act 1999 ("MPID").



 3.       The prosecution case is set out in paragraph Nos. 3(a) to (s)

 of Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1564 of 2025, which reads as

 under :




                                    Page 3 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                           ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          "a. Pranay Prakash Singhi, Sushil Eknath Ghule,
          Abhijit Vasant Shende and the present Applicants run a
          construction company known as SSG Realty and Infra
          LLP and have their offices at Survey Nos. 8/3/2, 8/3/3,
          Vellore Towers, Keshav Nagar, Mundhwa, Pune
          (hereinafter referred to as the "said Firm").

          b.    In the year 2014, the said Firm commenced the
          construction of a new building project known as
          'Suburbia Estate' located at Gat No. 501, Nagar Road,
          behind Wakefield Company, Lonikand, Pune (hereinafter
          referred to as the "said Project"). The said Project is
          registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority
          (RERA) bearing RERA registration No. P 52100002391.

          c.    The Informant learned about the said Project
          through billboards/hoardings put up in the vicinity of
          the said Project.

          d.     Sometime in January 2015, the Informant and his
          wife visited the office of the said Project for purchasing a
          flat and met a person named Mr. Deepak Singh from the
          sales team of the said Firm.

          e.    Mr. Deepak Singh attended to the Informant and
          his wife and showed them the said Project and provided
          them with all the relevant and necessary information in
          respect of the said Project.

          f.    During the said visit, the Informant and his wife
          decided to book a flat in the said Project, being Flat No.
          601, 6th Floor, 'B' Building, admeasuring 61.22 sq.mtr.,
          along with 9.94 sq.mtr. terrace and 9.29 sq.mtr. parking
          space, costing a total of Rs.36,11,750/- and decided to
          buy the same at the quoted price (hereinafter referred to
          as the "said Flat").



                                 Page 4 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          g.    Accordingly, on 29 January 2015, the Informant
          paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- via cheque drawn on
          his bank account with ICICI Bank, Satara Road, Pune,
          bearing bank account no. 033701500891 in the name of
          said Firm and booked the said Flat.

          h. As far as the balance amount towards the
          consideration of the said Flat was concerned, the
          Informant was introduced to the one of the employees
          of ICICI Bank, namely Mr. Sagar Bhadakwad by Mr.
          Deepak Singh. Upon instructions by the Informant, Mr.
          Sagar Bhadakwad prepared a loan file for the balance
          consideration amount of Rs.30,72,671/- in favor of the
          Informant.

          i.    Subsequently, on 13 February 2015, ICICI Bank,
          Bhandarkar Road, Pune approved the loan and
          transferred an amount of Rs. 30,72,671/- in the loan
          account bearing No. 00002353959.

          j. Thereafter, on 27 February 2015, the Informant
          entered into an agreement for sale for the purchase of
          the said Flat and the said agreement was registered
          bearing registration No. 2510/2015 with the Registrar
          Office - 4, Pune (hereinafter referred to as the "said
          Agreement'). The registration fees of Rs.30,000/- and
          stamp duty of Rs.1,44,500/- was also paid in respect of
          this transaction. [Annexed hereto and marked as
          EXHIBIT 'B' is a copy of the Agreement for Sale executed
          between the Informant and the said Firm.]

          k. Between 11 February 2015 to 21 June 2019 the
          Informant paid a total amount of Rs. 38,41,775/- to the
          said Firm from the loan availed by him from ICICI Bank.




                                Page 5 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                       ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          l.     As per the said Agreement, the Accused persons
          were supposed to handover the possession of the said
          flat after a period of 30 months from the date of receipt
          of plinth certificate i.e., by August 2018.

          m. It is alleged that on 10 February 2016, the said
          Project received the plinth certificate and as per the
          terms of the said Agreement, the 30 months' period
          expired in August 2018, making it obligatory on the part
          of the Accused persons to hand over the possession of
          the said Flat to the Informant. It is alleged that despite
          several requests seeking possession of the said Flat,
          there was no response from the Accused persons, nor
          did the Accused persons refund the amount paid by the
          Informant.

          n.    The said Firm applied to the RERA seeking
          extension of time to complete the said Project on 10
          August 2018, 10 August 2019, 9 August 2020, 2
          November 2020 and 30 April 2023. On each occasion,
          the RERA was pleased to grant the extension sought for
          by the said Firm for completion of the said Project.

          o.    As per the provisions of Section 28(b) of the Real
          Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016
          (hereinafter referred to as the "RERA Act"), it is
          mandatory for the developers/builders to obtain
          permission from at least 51% of the purchasers before
          approaching the RERA authorities for seeking extension
          of time for completion of projects.

          p.    The Informant's friend, one Mr. Prakash Johare,
          had approached the RERA offices with an application
          under the provisions of the Right to Information Act,
          2006, and on 30 April 2023, Mr. Prakash Johare learned
          that only 29% of the purchasers had given their consent



                                Page 6 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                       ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          for the extension of time. Upon receiving this
          information, the Suburbia Association Trust filed a
          complaint against the Accused persons and the said
          Firm, which are pending as on date.

          q.    According to the information received from the
          MahaRERA, the said Firm has received an amount of
          Rs.63,61,67,979/- and has also availed a loan for an
          amount of Rs. 23 Crores from C. Com. Bank, Andheri
          Branch.

          r.    It is alleged that less than 70% of the total funds
          collected from flat owners had been used for the
          construction of the said Project, despite this being
          mandatory under the provisions of the RERA Act. It is
          also alleged that the Accused persons have
          misappropriated the funds received the said Firm.

          s. It is alleged that the said Firm and the Accused
          persons have cheated the Informant for an amount of
          Rs. 36,11,750/- and other flat owners for a total sum of
          Rs. 94,49,44,353/-."
                                                (Emphasis added)

 4.       It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Applicants

 that the dispute if any, is of the civil nature.


 5.       On the other hand, it is the submissions of the learned APP

 that the offence is serious and therefore custodial interrogation is

 necessary.

 6.       Mr. Khandeparkar, learned amicus submitted that the

 offence is very serious.



                                 Page 7 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




 7.       It is the prosecution case that less than 70% of the total

 funds collected from flat owners had been used for the

 construction of the said Project, and that the Accused persons have

 cheated the First Informant for an amount of Rs. 36,11,750/- and

 other flat owners for a total sum of Rs. 94,49,44,353/-

 8.       This Court after noticing that many flat purchasers who have

 paid substantial amounts are affected by the subject crime

 appointed Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, learned Senior Counsel a/w

 Mr. Vaibhav Ugle, learned Counsel to represent the interest of the

 flat purchasers.

 9.       Learned Counsel for the Applicants in ABA No. 1564 of 2025

 and ABA No. 1570 of 2025 tenders additional Affidavit dated 22 nd

 December 2025 (Pages 161 to 171). Paragraph Nos. 1 to 8 of said

 Affidavit reads as under "

          "1. In continuation of our Affidavits dated
          11/07/2025, the Applicants on behalf of SSG Realty &
          Infra LLP undertake to complete the subject project in
          accordance with the sanctioned / approved / proposed
          plans, obtain Occupancy Certificate and handover
          possession of buildings completed in all respects fit to be
          occupied within a period of 14 months from the date of
          the Order. All Applicants shall be jointly and severally
          liable to perform the undertaking given hereinabove. In
          an event of there being any delay in completion of the
          project other than defaults / non- compliances on the




                                 Page 8 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          part of the Applicants, the Applicants be at liberty to
          approach this Hon'ble Court for extension of timelines.

          2.    The Purchasers / Complainants / Members of the
          Association shall pay the balance consideration payable
          under the Agreements for Sale against and at the time of
          handing over the possession.

          3. As the Applicants have agreed to receive the balance
          consideration amount from the present for Purchasers,
          the Applicants shall be seeking necessary relief to sell
          the unsold component in the subject project to raise
          funds for completing the construction of the subject
          project, and the Purchaser/Complainant / Members of
          the Association shall not raise any objections for the
          same before any Court or Authority.

          4.     In an event of any of the Purchasers of the flats
          being desirous of selling the flats in the market, the
          Applicants undertake to give their no objection and
          further execute the Tripartite Agreement subject to
          payment of the balance consideration in accordance
          with the Agreement executed by the Applicants with the
          Purchasers. Annexed hereto and marked as ANNEXURE
          '1' is a list of flat purchasers indicating the balance
          amounts to be paid.

          5.     In order to facilitate the completion of the project
          and permit the Applicants to extend the MahaRERA
          registration, the Purchasers / Complainants / Members
          of the Association shall give their no objection / consent
          for the project with sanctioned / proposed / plans,
          within a period of 15 days from the date of the Order,
          and ensure and obtain necessary extension / consent




                                 Page 9 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                        ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                  609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          from the MahaRERA within a further period of 30 days
          thereof.

          6.    In an event of the failure of the Applicants to
          comply with the undertakings, all consequences to
          follow including seeking cancellation of Anticipatory
          Bail granted to the Applicants.

          7.    In the event of compliance of the undertaking by
          the Applicants, all Purchasers/Complainants / Members
          of the Association shall give their no objection for
          quashing of the proceedings arising out of the subject
          project.

          8.   The Applicants / Deponents herein take the entire
          responsibility to comply with the present undertaking."

 10.      Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Senior Counsel tenders Affidavit

 of Ravi Ranjan Kandhway, President of Association of flat

 purchasers i.e. Suburbia Association Trust, filed on behalf of all

 the flat purchasers. The paragraph No. 1(a) to 1(e) of the said

 Affidavit reads as under :

          "a. If the Applicants takes 14 months 45 days to
          complete the subject project in accordance with
          sanction plan, obtain Occupancy Certificate, and
          handover peaceful vacant possession of all respective
          flat buyers of Suburbia Estate, Lonikand, Pune 412 216.
          All the Applicants shall be jointly and severally liable to
          perform such acts.




                                 Page 10 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                         ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                  609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




          b.    The Applicants gives an undertaking to this
          Hon'ble Court about that they will complete the subject
          project, obtain Occupancy Certificate, and handover
          possession of the said Flat to all the respective buyers
          within 14 months and 45 days from today with all the
          commitments as per the sale agreement.


          c.    The Applicants gives NOC and allow all the
          respective buyers to sell/transfer/create third party
          right in respect of the said Flat without imposing any
          conditions. The balance consideration of the respective
          flat would be due and payable by the buyers against at
          the time of possession only. We say that, we have no
          objections for quashing of FIR after fulfillment of
          aforesaid terms and conditions and after handing over
          peaceful possession of the respective flats.


          d.    In an event that the Applicants failed to complete
          the subject project as per approved plans, obtain
          Occupancy Certificate, and handover possession of the
          said Flat to all the buyers within the stipulated time,
          inthatcase, the pre-arrest bail as granted to the
          Applicants by this Hon'ble Court shall stand cancelled
          without further reference to this Hon'ble Court.


          e.    As far as civil remedies of all respective flat buyers
          are concerned, the same be expressly kept open without
          any terms and conditions."


 11.      Although the offence is very serious, however, as the

 Applicants in ABA No.1564 of 2025 and ABA No. 1570 of 2025

 have undertaken to handover possession of the subject flats by




                                 Page 11 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                         ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




 obtaining occupancy certificate to the flat purchasers within a

 period of 14 months from the date of this Order, the case is made

 out for granting anticipatory bail.

 12.        The various statements made in the said Additional

 Affidavit dated 22nd December 2025 by the Applicants in ABA

 No.1564 of 2025 and in ABA No. 1570 of 2025 are accepted as

 undertakings given to this Court.

 13.      On the earlier date, Mr. Nimbalkar, learned Senior Counsel

 for the Applicant in ABA No. 1651 of 2025 submitted that the

 Applicant- Abhijit Vasant Shende has already retired on 4th August

 2017 from SSG Realty & Infra LLP. Learned Counsel appearing for

 the Applicant in ABA No. 1564 of 2025 and 1570 of 2005 confirms

 the said position and states that the entire responsibility is of the

 Applicants in ABA No. 1564 of 2025 and 1570 of 2025 to comply

 with the undertakings as set out in additional Affidavit dated 22 nd

 December 2025.

 14.      Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Senior Counsel submits that it be

 clarified that civil remedies of all respective flat buyers are kept

 open. Mr. Mundargi, learned Counsel for the Applicants states that

 as by additional Affidavit dated 22 nd December 2025, the

 Applicants in ABA No. 1564 of 2025 and 1570 of 2025 have agreed



                               Page 12 of 15
 Dusane

::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025                       ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::
                                                   609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC




 to handover possession of respective flats within a period of 14

 months, the civil action will not be necessary.

 15.      However, it is clarified that all contentions to be raised in

 such civil remedy, if adopted, are expressly kept open.

 16.      Thus, by imposing conditions, the case is made out for grant

 of Anticipatory Bail to the Applicants. Hence, following Order is

 passed:

                                      ORDER

(i) In the event of arrest, the Applicants- (1) Saurabh Eknath Ghule, (2) Vinay Prakash Shingi in ABA No. 1564 of 2025, Applicants- (1) Pranay Prakash Shingi, (2) Sushil Eknath Ghule in ABA No. 1570 of 2025 and Applicant- Abhijit Vasant Shende in ABA No.1651 of 2025 be released on bail in C.R. No.922 of 2024 registered with Lonikand Police Station, Pune City, on executing P.R. bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- each and furnishing one or two solvent sureties each in the like amount.

Page 13 of 15 Dusane ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 ::: 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC

(ii) The Applicants shall attend the concerned Police as and when called by the Police and shall co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The Applicants shall furnish their cell phone numbers and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep the same updated, in case of any change thereto.

(iv) The Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any Police personnel.

(v) The Applicants shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.

(vi) The Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not contact or influence the Complainant, or any witness, in any manner. Page 14 of 15 Dusane ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 ::: 609 ABAS 1564,1570,1651.25.DOC

17. The Anticipatory Bail Applications are allowed and disposed of accordingly.

18. In view of disposal of the Anticipatory Bail Applications, the Interim Applications do not survive and the same are also disposed of.

19. This Court places on record appreciation of the assistance rendered by Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, learned Senior Counsel alongwith Mr. Vaibhav Ugle learned Counsel appointed as amici curiae.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Page 15 of 15 Dusane ::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2025 20:33:29 :::