Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Kamleshbhai Motibhai Parmar (Dalit) & vs State Of Gujarat on 10 March, 2016

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

                 R/CR.MA/4923/2016                                              ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL ) NO. 4923 of
                                             2016

         ==========================================================
               KAMLESHBHAI MOTIBHAI PARMAR (DALIT) & 1....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         DELETED for the Applicant(s) No. 2
         MR VO JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant No.1
         MR ANKIT Y BACHANI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         MS MOXA THAKKAR APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

                                     Date : 10/03/2016


                                      ORAL ORDER

[1] By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant original accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in case of his arrest in connection with the FIR registered as C.R No.I-01 of 2016 before Deesa Rural Police Station, District: Banaskantha for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 395, 504 etc. of the Indian Penal Code.

[2] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such for which custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee away from the justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail by Page 1 of 4 HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Fri Mar 11 02:16:44 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/4923/2016 ORDER imposing suitable conditions.

Learned advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions including imposition of conditions with regard to powers of Investigating Agency to file an application before the competent Court for his remand. Learned advocate for the applicant would further submit that upon filing of such application by the Investigating Agency, the right of applicant to oppose such application on merits may be kept open.

[3] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. I have perused the papers of investigation including the medical certificate of the girl Heenaben, who is sustained simple injury. However, without going nature of injury and weapon alleged to have been used by the applicant, I am of the opinion that the application requires consideration.

[4] Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the papers.

[5] Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. as reported at [2011] 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors., as reported at (1980) 2 SCC 665.





                                                 Page 2 of 4

HC-NIC                                        Page 2 of 4      Created On Fri Mar 11 02:16:44 IST 2016
                   R/CR.MA/4923/2016                                             ORDER



[6] In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of applicant herein being arrested pursuant to FIR registered as C.R No.I-01 of 2016 before Deesa Rural Police Station, District: Banaskantha, the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of like amount on the following conditions that the applicant shall :

(a) cooperate with the investigation and make available for interrogation whenever required;
(b) remain present at concerned Police Station on 14.03.2016 between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
(c) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(d) not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(e) at the time of execution of bond, furnish the address to the investigating officer and the court concerned and shall not change residence till the final disposal of the case till further orders;
(f) not leave India without the permission of the Court and if having passport shall deposit the same before the Trial Court within a week; and
(g) it would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just and the learned Magistrate would decide it on merits;

[7] Despite this order, it would be open for the Investigating Agency to apply to the competent Magistrate, for police remand of the applicant. The applicant shall remain present before the learned Page 3 of 4 HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Fri Mar 11 02:16:44 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/4923/2016 ORDER Magistrate on the first date of hearing of such application and on all subsequent occasions, as may be directed by the learned Magistrate. This would be sufficient to treat the accused in the judicial custody for the purpose of entertaining application of the prosecution for police remand. This is, however, without prejudice to the right of the accused to seek stay against an order of remand, if, ultimately, granted and the power of the learned Magistrate to consider such a request in accordance with law. It is clarified that the applicant, even if, remanded to the police custody, upon completion of such period of police remand, shall be set free immediately, subject to other conditions of this anticipatory bail order. At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. Rule is made absolute. Application is disposed of accordingly. Direct service is permitted.

(A.J.DESAI, J.) vijay Page 4 of 4 HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Fri Mar 11 02:16:44 IST 2016