Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Bhajan Lal Vishnoi vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 September, 2022
Author: Arun Bhansali
Bench: Arun Bhansali
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5915/2022
Bhajan Lal Vishnoi S/o Shri Veerma Ram Vishnoi, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village Koja, Tehsil Dhorimana, District
Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Commissioner, Police Headquarter, Jaipur.
4. Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6166/2022
Rinku Sharma D/o Shri Bheru Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Village Kher Maliyo Tehsil Khermiya District Pratapgarh Pincode
312604.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghra
Ghati, Jaipur Road Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6243/2022
Kailash S/o Shri Reshama Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident
Of Village Post Kerala Nada, Bhikamkor, Tehsil Lohawat, District
Jodhpur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Home Affairs, Rajasthan, Secretariat,
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(2 of 10)
Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police
(Headquarter), Jaipur.
3. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer,
Through Its Secretary.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6254/2022
Bhavesh Choubisa S/o Shri Raman Lal Choubisa, Aged About 23
Years, Mukan Post Pachlasa Bada Pachlasa Bara District
Dungarpur Pincode 314038.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq, Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6341/2022
Bhajan Lal S/o Uda Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Harshwara,
Kuda, Tehsil Raniwara, District Jalore, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6466/2022
Buddha Ram S/o Baboo Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 232,
Bishnoiyo Ki Dhani, Sewari, District Jalore, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(3 of 10)
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6480/2022
Om Prakash Choudhary S/o Shri Ratan Lal Choudhary, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Village Sarela Khurd Tehsil Mavli District
Udaipur Rajasthan Pincode 313203.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road Ajmer
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6490/2022
Suresh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Kishan Lal Jat, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Shivpura Tehsil Bhinder District Udaipur Rajasthan
Pincode 313604.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6504/2022
Dharmendra Gila S/o Shri Sita Ram Gila, Aged About 22 Years,
R/o Village Post Chhapra Tehsil Jayal District Nagaur Rajasthan.
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(4 of 10)
Pincode 341022.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
5. The Director/principal/officer In Charge Rpa, Pani Peech
Jaipur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6538/2022
Jay Kumar Mochi S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Mochi, Aged About 27
Years, R/o 35/138 Ramdev Colony University Road Pahada City
Udaipur District Udaipur Rajasthan Pincode 313001.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6654/2022
Ms. Shilpa Bishnoi D/o Ram Partap, Aged About 26 Years, Chak
21 Ndr, Po Chohilanwali, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(5 of 10)
3. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7721/2022
Yogpal Singh Ahada S/o Shri Bheem Singh Ahada, Aged About
24 Years, R/o 3/365 Ramdev Chowk Shivaji Nagar District
Dungerpur Pincode 314001.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7865/2022
Deepak Kumar Meghwal S/o Poonam Chandra, Aged About 24
Years, Village Achalpura Tehsil Chhoti Sadri District Pratapgarh
Rajasthan Pin Code 312604.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its
Chairman Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7875/2022
Dinesh Meghwal S/o Shri Gokul Meghwal, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Barodiya Post Barodiya Vaya Kheroda District
Udaipur Pincode 313602.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(6 of 10)
Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8428/2022
Dashrath Kumar S/o Asu Ram, Aged About 32 Years, Village Post
Sarnau, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home
Department, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Inspector General Of Police, Recruitment And
Promotion Board, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ajmer.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8494/2022
Anil Bishnoi S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 22 Years,
Dharmpuri Ki Dhani, Vpo Khejarli Kalan, Tehsil Luni, District
Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home
Department, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Inspector General Of Police, Recruitment And
Promotion Board, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ajmer.
----Respondents
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(7 of 10)
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8505/2022
Nirma Manda D/o Ram Gopal Manda, Aged About 23 Years, Bara
Bas Rasisar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home, Government, Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission,
Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9712/2022
Aashish Purbiya S/o Shri Sohan Lal Purbiya, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Near Hanuman Mandir Kaladwas Tehsil Girva Udaipur
District Udaipur Rajasthan Pincode 313003.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11490/2022
Rakesh Dangi S/o Shri Bhanwan Lal Dangi, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Village - Post Bhesra Khurd Tehsil Girwa District Udaipur
Pincode 313024.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ghooghara
Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM)
(8 of 10)
Jaipur.
4. The Adg/ig (Recruitment), Phq Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hapu Ram Bishnoi.
Mr. Ripudaman Singh.
Mr. R.R. Ankiya.
Mr. S.R. Godara.
Mr. Inderjeet Yadav.
Mr. J.K. Vishnoi.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG with
Mr. Kailash Choudhary.
Mr. Rajesh Punia.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order 16/09/2022 These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved against the result of their physical efficiency test, which has resulted in their failure at the recruitment on the post of Sub Inspector pursuant to advertisement dated 3.2.2021.
The petitions have been filed seeking a review by the Court of the PET conducted by the respondents, wherein it is claimed that petitioners in fact had done the needful during PET to qualify and/or to obtain better marks.
Learned AAG submits that issue as raised in the present writ petitions have been considered by Bench at Jaipur in Jugal Kishore Gurjar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No. 5853/2022 and other connected matters decided on 16.8.2022, wherein the petitions have been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners though attempted to make submissions seeking to distinguish the order and/or seek to contend that the order in the case of Jugal Kishore Gurjar (supra), (D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM) (9 of 10) requires reconsideration, the sum and substance of the prayer of the petitioners has been negated by the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Jugal Kishore Gurjar (supra).
In the case of Jugal Kishore Gurjar (supra), the Bench, inter alia, observed and directed as under:-
"12. Heard counsels for the parties and perused the record.
13. These writ petitions filed by the petitioners deserve to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly, a Board was constituted by the respondents, comprising of Higher Officers of the Department i.e. Inspector General of Police, Deputy Inspector General of Police and Superintendent of Police to have a check and vigil over the holding & completing the PET so as to take care of even each & every iota of problem or difficulty which a candidate may face during the said process; secondly, straightaway the allegation of mala-fides & arbitrariness has been levelled by the petitioners against the respondents but neither any material in support of the said allegation has been placed on record by the petitioners nor any person by name has been impleaded as party respondent in the writ petitions and there are several verdicts of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that in absence of sufficient cogent material in support of the allegation of malafides & arbitrariness, no credence can be attached to the said allegation; thirdly in my considered view, summoning & showing the videography & chips to each & every candidate will unnecessarily delay the completion of the selection process as it will open the gates of flood & the pandora box; fourthly the issue of videography & Chip as argued by counsels for the petitioners, has already examined by this Court in detail in the matter of Vishwas Sinsinwar (supra) and the contention raised therein with regard to summoning videography and chip was turned down by this Court in that matter, as such the same issue raised herein is of no substance and lastly, in view of the judgments referred above, in my considered view no case is made out for interference by this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
14. Hence, these writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed.
15. Copy of the order be placed separately in each file".
In view of the above fact situation, following the order in the case of Jugal Kishore Gurjar (supra), the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are dismissed.
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM) (10 of 10) Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the petitioners have deposited demand drafts of Rs. 20,000/- each with the respondents. Learned AAG shall return back the said demand drafts to the respective counsel representing the petitioners.
The Banks are directed to refund the amount of demand drafts to the respective petitioners.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J 24-42-sumer/-
(D.B. SAW/755/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 16/09/2022 at 09:21:48 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)