Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Ddas Mr. Jaidev Agarwalla & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal on 20 December, 2016

Author: Arindam Sinha

Bench: Arindam Sinha

                                                    1




                                                  WP 9050 (W) of 2004
       20.12.2016
 06
ddas                                          Mr. Jaidev Agarwalla & Anr.
                                                         Vs.
                                              The State of West Bengal


                             Mr. Haradhan Banerjee
                             Mr. A. Pain
                             Mr. M. K. Show
                             Mr. Subhrangshu Dutta
                                           ... ... For the petitioners

                             Mr. Pradip Kr. Das
                                             ... ... For the UOI

                             Mr. Sanjoy Bhattacharya
                             Mr. Rizanur Rahaman
                                            ... ...For the WBFC

                             Mr. Chayan Gupta
                             Mr. P. Banjerjee
                                             ... ...For the respondent no. 3

Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of the petitioners and files affidavit-of-service. Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate appears for the West Bengal Financial Corporation and submits, his is a transferred brief. He does not have copies of the pleadings. He requests copies from Mr. Banerjee on usual terms. Mr. Banerjee assures this Court that in the event copies are requested for on terms, he will supply the same but omission to request should not be a ground for adjournment on the next date.

List this writ petition for hearing on 4th January, 2017. It is made clear that the petitioners are pressing for hearing, so prayer for adjournment is not likely to be granted.

(Arindam Sinha, J.) 2 3