R.Ramadoss vs The Inspector Of Police on 24 August, 2017

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Ramadoss vs The Inspector Of Police on 24 August, 2017

Bench: M.S.Ramesh

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

Crl.O.P.No.17372 of 2017
R.Ramadoss						.. 	Petitioner

         Vs.
The Inspector of Police,
F4, Thousand Light Police Station,
Thousand Light, Chennai 600 006.		.. 	Respondent

     									
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent to register the complaint under Sections 440, 441, 323, 506(2) of IPC, dated 27.07.2017, given to the respondent.

		For Petitioner  	: 	Mr. Kingsly Solomon. J.

	    	For Respondent 	: 	Mr.P.Govindarajan
						Additional Public Prosecutor.


					ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case on the basis of a complaint given by the petitioner dated 27.07.2017.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by him on 27.07.2017 to the respondent, the same has been kept in abeyance without any action. It is well settled in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2013 (6) CTC 353], that registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if an information furnished to the police officer disclose commission of a cognizable offence and in cases where the information does not disclose a cognizable offence, a preliminary enquiry has to be conducted.

4.The respondent is not justified in having received the complaint and keeping it unattended without any further action. In view of the same, the petitioner has made out a case for this Court to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Hence, the respondent is directed as follows:

1) If the information received by the respondent discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then, the same shall be forthwith registered.

2) If an information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, the respondent shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed therein or not and such inquiry shall be completed within a period of seven days from the date of information.

3) If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered.

4) If the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, the disclosure report must be recorded along with the reasonings and a copy of the same shall be furnished to the complainant within one week.

5) All information relating to cognizable offences whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading an inquiry must be reflected in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the respondent's police station.

M.S.RAMESH.J, mrp

5. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed with the above directions.

24.08.2017 Index:Yes/No mrp

1.The Inspector of Police, F4, Thousand Light Police Station, Thousand Light, Chennai 600 006.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.17372 of 2017

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Madras High Court