Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Kuldeep Kumar vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 21 October, 2016

Author: Rajiv Narain Raina

Bench: Rajiv Narain Raina

                                                   1
CWP No.21830 of 2016




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                             CHANDIGARH

                                                   Date of decision: 21.10.2016


                                                   CWP No.21830 of 2016


Kuldeep Kumar                                                        ...Petitioner


                                             Vs.


State of Haryana & others                                            ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:               Mr. Ganesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner, who is 100% blind, has approached this Court against threatened transfer to another school in implementation of the Teachers Transfer Policy-2016.

This Court has already expressed its opinion on the rights of teachers who are 100% blind/visually impaired that they were ordinarily not be transferred subject to work and conduct remaining overboard. This case is covered by the decision in CWP No.16119 of 2016, Pardeep Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others, decided on September 09, 2016.

Accordingly, the petitioner has sufficient protection of Court directions in a similar and identical case.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and waives service on them.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 30-10-2016 12:03:37 ::: 2 CWP No.21830 of 2016 In view of the order proposed to be passed, it is not necessary to receive the reply from the State since the subject matter is no longer res judicata.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed with a direction that the petitioner would have the protection of the judgment in Pardeep Singh's case and will not be transferred unless he is facing disciplinary action etc. A direction issued in Pardeep Singh' case will cover the present one.




                                                          [RAJIV NARAIN RAINA]
                                                                  JUDGE
21.10.2016
Vimal

                       Whether speaking/reasoned:                Yes

                       Whether Reportable:                       No




                                          2 of 2
                       ::: Downloaded on - 30-10-2016 12:03:38 :::